Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jedi Guy

(3,501 posts)
14. Of course the family will demand an independent autopsy.
Wed Sep 17, 2025, 10:18 AM
Sep 2025

You know this. I know this. And the medical examiner knows this.

So now let me ask you: what purpose would it serve for the medical examiner to lie? What logical reason would they have to knowingly lie and claim there are no signs of violence when they know full well that the truth will out in days or a week at most? And furthermore, they'd know that once the truth is out they'll be subject to the blowback of their lie, consequences both professional and personal.

So no, it doesn't pass the smell test that this medical examiner is knowingly, maliciously telling an easily disprovable lie. I suppose I could believe lying about something very subtle that they could claim to have missed.

But broken bones in three limbs? Something that obvious isn't going to be missed, particularly when in some cases broken bones are visible to a casual inspection unless we're talking about hairline fractures.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Two Mississippi men were ...»Reply #14