Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(94,672 posts)
12. both
Thu Sep 18, 2025, 07:41 PM
Sep 2025

...the more meaningful distinction, imo, is between authoritarian and totalitarian.

Authoritarian: some liberties, but fealty to the central government line, vs. totalitarian, no personal liberties with the same fealty but total.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'd say authoritarian, moving towards fascism. sinkingfeeling Sep 2025 #1
Agree. Currently we're close to hybrid subtype moving towards fascist subtype. still-prayin4rain Sep 2025 #15
If the Shoe Fits-Here's the List MrWowWow Sep 2025 #2
Thanks! Were There! Bread and Circuses Sep 2025 #5
With reactionary, extremist-right demagogues exercising authoritarian power... pat_k Sep 2025 #3
Italian-style fascist. roamer65 Sep 2025 #4
Both. The politics is authoritarian. The monopolistic corporate economic engine run by oligarchs is fascist. ancianita Sep 2025 #6
You have completely misconstrued my post. BigmanPigman Sep 2025 #7
Duly noted. ancianita Sep 2025 #9
Duly noted BigmanPigman Sep 2025 #11
They're not mutually exclusive. In fact, Crunchy Frog Sep 2025 #8
Thanks, that's an explanation I was looking for. BigmanPigman Sep 2025 #10
True. ancianita Sep 2025 #13
both bigtree Sep 2025 #12
Yes H2O Man Sep 2025 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Which applies to the US n...»Reply #12