Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

lostincalifornia

(5,476 posts)
Fri Sep 19, 2025, 05:43 PM Sep 2025

There have been several OPs saying the Senate unanimously approved a Charlie Kirk day of rememberance resolution, but [View all]

I cannot find a vote tally of those in the Senate who voted for it, and if anyone voted against it, or were not present.

It also wasn't done by a formal vote, but a procedural Senate way to avoid a formal vote called a Unanimous consent. Funny that our illustrious media outlets aren't reporting that.

The House vote you can easily find who voted for it, and it wasn't unanimous.

It is hard for me to believe that Bernie Sanders and some other Democrats would have voted for a resolution honoring a racist, which is why I would like to see the actually tally in the Senate.

Thanks in advance if anyone can find that final Senate vote on the resolution.

I can also tell you WHY you probably won't find it, because it was approved by Unanimous consent, which is a procedural shortcut that allows a motion or decision to be approved WITHOUT A FORMAL VOTE IF NO MEMBER PRESENT OBJECTS.

In other words I don't think they had a real vote.

According to Google AI:

Unanimous consent is not voted on but rather is passed by default if no one in the assembly objects to a proposed action. This process is used to fast-track routine or non-controversial matters by forgoing the need for a formal motion, debate, and vote.

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This message was self-deleted by its author drray23 Sep 2025 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author drray23 Sep 2025 #2
From what I can see, there was not a full senate vote questionseverything Sep 2025 #3
I think ABC and other MSM headlines are intentionally putting up misleading headlines, trying to represent lostincalifornia Sep 2025 #7
They only need 51 present for a quorum to take a voice vote Fiendish Thingy Sep 2025 #4
Either walked or weren't paying attention, but It is very unlikely that in a formal vote you would have Senate lostincalifornia Sep 2025 #8
A quorum was not present. lapucelle Sep 2025 #25
Thank you, lostincalifornia. sheshe2 Sep 2025 #5
It just that there seems to be so many outlets pushing a misleading narrative. I think it is prudent that we lostincalifornia Sep 2025 #12
I did a quick search before responding. sheshe2 Sep 2025 #16
More Info: TheProle Sep 2025 #6
Thank-you. A misleading headline from many of the MSM "news" outlets. lostincalifornia Sep 2025 #9
The country's lost its goddamn mind. TheProle Sep 2025 #10
and I don't think Antipsychotics will solve the problem, or maybe that is the problem, too many are already on them. lostincalifornia Sep 2025 #13
Thank You, The Prole! Cha Sep 2025 #20
It was just a Republican stunt. Quiet Em Sep 2025 #11
I think so, and from what I am observing a lot of the MSM don't mind pushing the misleading headline that lostincalifornia Sep 2025 #14
They've been extremely misleading Quiet Em Sep 2025 #17
Of course, the m$$$m Doesn't mind getting it Cha Sep 2025 #22
Thanks Cha. lostincalifornia Sep 2025 #23
You're Welcome, Cha Sep 2025 #24
Thank you for explaining kavotheclown Sep 2025 #15
Thanks for this mcar Sep 2025 #18
It passed by unanimous consent. Wiz Imp Sep 2025 #19
TY for bringing this up. Given the tally in the House I have also found the Senate claim baffling. Hekate Sep 2025 #21
The bottom line is that there was no tally in the Senate because a quorum wasn't present. lapucelle Sep 2025 #26
Kick nt Justice matters. Sep 2025 #27
There is no tally. The resolution was "approved" by a voice vote of those present. There was no quorum. lapucelle Sep 2025 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There have been several O...