Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

unblock

(56,308 posts)

2. not clear how the judge can summarily say the plaintiffs cannot show irreparable harm.

Reply to bigtree (Original post)

Wed Sep 24, 2025, 10:36 PM

Sep 2025

can they not provide evidence that some cases they were working on would be irreparably damaged by their firing, especially given that that may have been exactly why they were fired?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Rhiannon12866

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge declares Trump may have broken the law, but she has no authority to stop him, even from breaking it again [View all] bigtree Sep 2025 OP

SCOTUS offers no support to the lower courts newdeal2 Sep 2025 #1

not clear how the judge can summarily say the plaintiffs cannot show irreparable harm. unblock Sep 2025 #2

Because they can't show that he can't fire them FBaggins Sep 2025 #5

She will probably reinstate them if they win the lawsuit. But she doesnt see grounds to do so immediately. Right? SSJVegeta Sep 2025 #3

I don't think so FBaggins Sep 2025 #4

Wut Constitution? Kid Berwyn Sep 2025 #6

So does this mean the next Democratic President Buddyzbuddy Sep 2025 #7