Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OldBaldy1701E

(11,639 posts)
28. The late seventies to early eighties.
Fri Sep 26, 2025, 08:16 AM
Sep 2025

The stations were being taken over by those who only saw numbers. So, they decreed that their news programs, which they used to do solely because the FCC 'suggested' they had to do a certain amount of 'public programming', meaning news, or other community assistance. Then, the corporations that were buying up these stations and conglomerates decided that their news shows must have ratings like any other television show. SO, they thumbed their noses at the usual practice and made their news programs vie for ratings like any other show.

Now, how is a news program going to compete with Hollywood?

By being as 'Hollywood' as they could be. Of course, this has a detrimental effect on non-bias as well as presentation, because someone standing and dryly talking to the camera is not as exciting as a reporter charging up and sticking a mic into someone's face whether they like it or not and asking questions that no sensible person would ask at that time.

But, I don't blame the news programs, really. They fell into the new 'format' quickly enough, but they were also fighting for survival. However, the practice of letting the news not be dictated by ratings was removed and that led to the mess that we call 'the news' today.

The internet came along after than, but that is another story, and another reason why the news is not what it used to be.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Who was it who signed the Telecommunications Act? gab13by13 Sep 2025 #1
Post removed Post removed Sep 2025 #3
Billy boy John Coktosten Sep 2025 #4
Bravo, but this begs a very important question for Senator Murphy: Fiendish Thingy Sep 2025 #2
monopolies tfury653 Sep 2025 #5
and the result was..... lastlib Sep 2025 #13
You can start by returning to exempting the news programs from having to survive by ratings. OldBaldy1701E Sep 2025 #6
Excellent point. calimary Sep 2025 #7
I don't know it ever worked that way. When did that change? Takket Sep 2025 #9
The late seventies to early eighties. OldBaldy1701E Sep 2025 #28
When have news shows ever relied on ratings to survive? SickOfTheOnePct Sep 2025 #11
Well, first we have to find a defiinition of "news shows" progressoid Sep 2025 #17
Ah got it, thanks SickOfTheOnePct Sep 2025 #19
They rely on advertising to survive Captain Zero Sep 2025 #26
They don't, really. OldBaldy1701E Sep 2025 #29
Sure, a "public service" managed by that great "public servant".... reACTIONary Sep 2025 #15
Yup. (n/t) OldBaldy1701E Sep 2025 #30
Will never kacekwl Sep 2025 #8
Yes. But let's generalize the advice. Bluetus Sep 2025 #10
break up maliaSmith Sep 2025 #12
It is unpatriotic not to tell the truth, whether about the president or anyone else. Theodore Roosevelt Ping Tung Sep 2025 #14
I doubt many MAGAs even know who he is. progressoid Sep 2025 #18
First st3p is expanding the USSC to 13 Warpy Sep 2025 #16
THIS!!! calimary Sep 2025 #24
AND BIG ,MEDIA WILL DESTROY DEMS JUST AS THEY DID DEAN. pansypoo53219 Sep 2025 #20
I think Chris Murphy is one of the best communicators the Dem party has. yellow dahlia Sep 2025 #21
The breakup of the original "Ma Bell", American Telephone & Telegraph, into the Baby Bells dobleremolque Sep 2025 #22
Laughable Captain Obvious .... Too little way too late. I remember the race for media outlets live love laugh Sep 2025 #23
Only problem is Diraven Sep 2025 #25
The Telecommunications Act killed progressive/liberal/non-conservative radio. no_hypocrisy Sep 2025 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yes Senator Murphy! Yes! ...»Reply #28