Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(181,929 posts)
4. MaddowBlog-Trump offers Qatar, which gave him a fancy plane, a NATO-like security guarantee
Thu Oct 2, 2025, 06:17 PM
Oct 2025

Without bothering to go through Congress, the president signed an executive order this week vowing to defend Qatar in the event of a foreign attack.

Trump seems to offer protection to Qatar as a favor for donating a 0 million airplane for him. Where quid meets pro quo.

Trump offers Qatar, which gave him a fancy plane, a NATO-like security guarantee www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...

@jimrissmiller.bsky.social 2025-10-02T20:25:11.905Z

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-offers-qatar-gave-fancy-plane-nato-security-guarantee-rcna235175

In his first term, Trump slammed Qatar as a country that he said had been a “funder of terrorism at a very high level.” His perspective on the Middle Eastern country has apparently evolved quite a bit over eight years.

But the president’s shift has gone well beyond rhetorical praise. Politico reported:

The White House published an executive order on Wednesday vowing to defend Qatar in the event of an attack from another country, a remarkable security guarantee for a single country akin to NATO’s Article 5. The order, which President Donald Trump signed Monday, states that the White House will now consider ‘any armed attack’ on Qatar ‘as a threat to the peace and security of the United States
.’

Trump’s new executive order added that the U.S. was prepared to take “all lawful and appropriate measures — including diplomatic, economic and, if necessary, military — to defend the interests of the United States and the State of Qatar.”.....

Politico’s report added, “The unilateral creation of any Article 5-like security guarantees by a president — under the Constitution, treaties must be ratified by the Senate— is highly unusual.” That’s true, though it also understates matters. CNN’s Aaron Blake wrote a good analysis on this:

The Constitution explicitly gives the power over treaties to the Senate, and here’s the president bypassing Congress over something as serious as potentially committing the US military to war. Trump has bypassed Congress on plenty of things that are normally under its purview, mostly notably the tariffs that are currently being decided by the Supreme Court. And he’s mostly been successful thanks to congressional Republicans’ acquiescence. They often don’t want to challenge him. But yet again, Trump is pushing the envelope.


Yes, and he’s doing so in support of a country that just happens to have given him a free luxury jet.

It’s worth emphasizing that Trump’s executive order is not legally binding. Unlike the U.S.’ commitment to NATO, which has been ratified by lawmakers, Trump’s presidential successor would be free to ignore his vow of protection for Qatar.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Trump's pledge to def...»Reply #4