Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

choie

(6,493 posts)
Thu Oct 2, 2025, 05:39 PM Oct 2

Jamie Raskin's response to the propaganda on federal agency websites [View all]

Yes, indeed..the Hatch Act

"I have been contacted by numerous constituents outraged by the fact that the Trump Administration is now sending out blatantly partisan messages, both on official Websites and through emails from federal agencies. These official agency messages blame ‘Senate Democrats’ and the ‘Radical Left’ for the government shutdown. Taxpayer-funded service agencies like the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Small Business Administration are now being turned into MAGA propaganda organs.

"This looks like a naked violation of the Hatch Act, which forbids partisan activity in the federal workplace. If any agency head under any previous Administration ever used official letterhead to promote their political views, they would have been instantly fired, if not prosecuted. There is a reason for this. Taxpayers cannot be forced to be a captive audience for propaganda against the Administration’s opponents every time they inquire about their benefits and rights. Nor may an Administration grant itself a campaign contribution of free nationwide political ads by hijacking agency service messages. Surely the Trump Administration would be firing any Executive Branch employee today who set up an official Website message blaming Trump and Republicans for shutting down the government.

"One of the main distinctions between our country and Putin’s Russia, Xi’s China or Kim Jong-un’s North Korea is that government services and communications channels may not be perverted into instruments of partisan propaganda. If Trump and Stephen Miller get away with this, there is no limit to the kinds of partisan polemics that can be passed off as ‘government speech.’

"I have also received reports that the U.S. Department of Education—after their employees have left neutral and nonpartisan ‘out-of-office’ messages for correspondence during the shutdown—has now replaced these out-of-office messages without the employees’ consent with a completely political diatribe purportedly authored by that employee: ‘Thank you for contacting me. On September 19, 2025, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 5371, a clean continuing resolution. Unfortunately, Democrat Senators are blocking passage of H.R. 5371 in the Senate which has led to a lapse in appropriations. Due to the lapse in appropriations, I am currently in furlough status.’” This is a form of identity theft. It fraudulently depicts federal workers as personally disseminating a political message that they have never approved, do not want to be associated with and may be illegal.

"President Trump is free to spout any partisan nonsense he wants from his giant bully pulpit. But he may not coerce federal employees into joining his choir. I am calling on every agency and Department head implicated in these forms of Orwellian miscommunication to remove them immediately. This is an intolerable abuse of power.”


https://raskin.house.gov/2025/10/raskin-statement-on-trump-administration-s-politicization-of-federal-civil-service-possible-violations-of-the-hatch-act

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kick SheltieLover Oct 2 #1
And nothing will come of this Diraven Oct 2 #2
+1 dalton99a Oct 2 #3
Not sure Hatch Act has ever been enforced. It's essentially toothless. Silent Type Oct 2 #8
No time like the present. choie Oct 2 #17
Remember Al Gore Diraven Oct 3 #26
They'll care if Dems do it maxsolomon Oct 3 #33
What we need is an unpretentious pterodactyl to scoop trump GreenWave Oct 3 #29
I sure as hell hope they plan on suing the administration. choie Oct 2 #13
I received this email from the VA LogDog75 Oct 2 #4
You should forward that to Raskin dweller Oct 2 #6
Your last paragraph is correct. Boomerproud Oct 2 #19
Laws don't apply to trmp. spanone Oct 2 #5
Nice Sentiment. Just Get the Epstein Files Released (and Unredacted) for Now MrWowWow Oct 2 #7
But it was someone in the VA that sent out that message LogDog75 Oct 2 #9
I don't care if it doesn't apply to the president. choie Oct 2 #18
Raskin is right. Now what ancianita Oct 2 #10
It's a blatant violation. Put it on the list for 2029. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2 #11
Yep. That's about the best we can do. paleotn Oct 2 #12
Remember, the PedoPres brakester Oct 3 #30
And any person with two or more neurons to rub together know damned well... the nelm Oct 2 #14
I wonder if the victims could sue for misrepresentation. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2 #15
drumpf and his people don't GAF JoseBalow Oct 2 #16
Thank you for posting this!! Sparkly Oct 2 #20
I'm sure AG Blondie will get right on it. surfered Oct 2 #21
Looks like a naked violation? Gimpyknee Oct 2 #22
Thank you, Jamie Raskin! yellow dahlia Oct 2 #23
In his first administration. . . Jimvanhise Oct 3 #24
My very first day in a Federal job, I was personally instructed in the Hatch Act by the manager of the facility. Midnight Writer Oct 3 #25
And nothing will be done about it because the party in power doesn't give a flying fuck how many laws this SamKnause Oct 3 #27
Hatch Act gfarber Oct 3 #28
Good one, brakester Oct 3 #31
Example here malaise Oct 3 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jamie Raskin's response t...