General Discussion

Buckeyeblue

(6,416 posts)

18. Agreed. And giving sternly worded press conferences does nothing

Sat Oct 4, 2025, 09:38 AM

Oct 2025

He should create a group of peaceful disruptors called MELT. They would track ICE's movements across the city. Get in their way. Follow them with cameras. They should broadcast ICE's location. Maybe have warning sirens. Generally create legal chaos anywhere ICE is.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

oberle Trueblue Texan

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Police need a warrant to take you into custody. [View all] no_hypocrisy Oct 2025 OP

Because SCOTUS has enabled this administration to act extra-Constitutionally bucolic_frolic Oct 2025 #1

I'll finish your sentence DaBronx Oct 2025 #2

That's just not true.... sleroy49 Oct 2025 #3

that's if they see you committing a crime and that's just not the case for almost all of these ICE LymphocyteLover Oct 2025 #5

Since immigration violations are civil v. criminal... SickOfTheOnePct Oct 2025 #8

so illegal immigrants have committed a civil violation, but are treated like the most violent LymphocyteLover Oct 2025 #32

The police grab up perfectly peaceful protesters Farmer-Rick Oct 2025 #15

No. The police don't have to witness the crime. sleroy49 Oct 2025 #23

But what is the fucking crime? It's ignorance of your rights that allows this shit to continue. Solomon Oct 2025 #29

Ok, but there should be probable cause, right? LymphocyteLover Oct 2025 #33

And being colored or Hispanic infullview Oct 2025 #6

Tell that to the Supreme Court. Gimpyknee Oct 2025 #7

The Supremes have given up on the US Constitution Farmer-Rick Oct 2025 #16

Except there was no probable cause in this case Martin Eden Oct 2025 #9

This was a CRIME, and all ICE officers involved ought to be arrested and Jack Valentino Oct 2025 #28

The BIGGEST CRIMINALS ordered this raid Martin Eden Oct 2025 #34

Police need a reasonably articulable suspicion that a crime has been or will be committed to arrest or detain sop Oct 2025 #10

Yes, I would really like some legal clarity on this LymphocyteLover Oct 2025 #4

And don't forget the 4th amendment. For the most part the government can't enter your home without a warrant Buckeyeblue Oct 2025 #11

Well, if Prizker isn't the governor to protect these citizens... Trueblue Texan Oct 2025 #13

Agreed. And giving sternly worded press conferences does nothing Buckeyeblue Oct 2025 #18

You should send these suggestions to him. nt Trueblue Texan Oct 2025 #25

How about breaking down a door to your apartment in the middle of the night? surfered Oct 2025 #12

A warrant is always required to enter someone's home...except under "exigent circumstances." sop Oct 2025 #14

Has the Supreme Court ruled skin color to be an exigent circumstance ? surfered Oct 2025 #19

Don't think they addressed exigency, but the SC's recent decision allows racial profiling during immigration raids. sop Oct 2025 #20

Thank you. Do you believe the residents of that complex who are US citizens have a cause of action. surfered Oct 2025 #21

Yes. sop Oct 2025 #22

Thank you. Trump won't care, he's not going to pay any judgement. We will. surfered Oct 2025 #24

Has Ice decided they operate outside the Constitution and the Amendments? yellow dahlia Oct 2025 #26

In a word, yes. Deuxcents Oct 2025 #27

The fucker-in-chief has 'unleashed them'. Nazi style. spanone Oct 2025 #17

The Supremes have suspended the Constitution, Crunchy Frog Oct 2025 #30

No they don't and your statement is false. They need probable cause to detain and if you resist that's obstructing. Hellbound Hellhound Oct 2025 #31