General Discussion

PennsylvaniaMatt

(966 posts)

6. I was wondering the same thing

Tue Dec 25, 2012, 02:05 PM

Dec 2012

When I first read about how Tagg went on and on saying that daddy never wanted to be President, blah blah blah. Who the hell is he kidding? Mitt has been running since 2006. Plus, if he never wanted to be President, wouldn't you think he would be RELIEVED that he didn't win, instead of having a total breakdown for about a month (talking bitter even after he lost, looking like he didn't clean himself for weeks on end, etc.) Never has a losing political candidate EVER disappeared into complete seclusion like Mitt and Ann did after November 6th. They have got to be the most inauthentic family I have ever seen!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I'm confused. RE: Ann Romney... [View all] rateyes Dec 2012 OP

No. They are dishonest, inauthentic phoneys. They are incapable of truth telling. morningfog Dec 2012 #1

+3,110 Angry Dragon Dec 2012 #3

Habitual, genetic liars... PCIntern Dec 2012 #2

Pathological liars.. SummerSnow Dec 2012 #4

Someone Correct Me If I'm Wrong dballance Dec 2012 #5

I was wondering the same thing PennsylvaniaMatt Dec 2012 #6

They are all liars. Mitt Romney basically quit working and spent nearly 7 years running for this Skidmore Dec 2012 #7

bingo... thought he would ride in on a white horse oldhippydude Dec 2012 #9

The Capehart article had a nice phrase: "ideological promiscuity." Squinch Dec 2012 #8

It never ends Quantess Dec 2012 #10

He didn't realize that running for office entailed actual "work". Ruby the Liberal Dec 2012 #11

Right... who else will run... after I've carpetbombed any possible challenger jsmirman Dec 2012 #12