Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cirsium

(4,206 posts)
25. Seriously?
Wed Oct 8, 2025, 01:04 PM
Oct 2025

In the case of this house burning down, we do not yet know how it happened. You know that, you know that I know that, and I haven't said anything to the contrary.

Are you unclear about who is in power? It is the man who is relentlessly attacking judges who try to apply the law to protect the powerless from his lawless attacks. Only if you remove the power imbalance from the discussion, which is unfortunately a common error, can it seem like Trump is the one being accused or harassed by the state, that Trump is the one being threatened, that Trump is the one being kidnapped and detained, that Trump is the one being denied due process, and therefore needs us to give him the benefit of doubt.

The president of the United States is continually threatening to harm anyone who gets in his way. He is encouraging his followers to threaten, harass and harm those who get in his way. People who get in his way are in fact being harmed - at the direction of the most powerful person in the country.

I hope that whoever is eventually accused of this particular crime is afforded due process under the law. Should Trump and his acolytes ever be brought to justice, I hope that they are afforded due process under the law.

Trump is inciting violence, openly, forcefully. Violence against those he targets is happening.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This message was self-deleted by its author Chasstev365 Oct 2025 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author WarGamer Oct 2025 #2
What a card you are! dpibel Oct 2025 #4
It's definitely on brand. BannonsLiver Oct 2025 #11
Are you also wary of people who dream up wild theories? WarGamer Oct 2025 #12
Wild theories? dpibel Oct 2025 #13
Of course. But in some cases they aren't theories. They're facts observed by others as well. BannonsLiver Oct 2025 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author ZZenith Oct 2025 #10
Yeah! Houses just blow up all the time. Especially when the occupant has just pissed off Donnie Dumbass! paleotn Oct 2025 #5
Oh stop it Cirsium Oct 2025 #8
Lots of good points in this post. calimary Oct 2025 #9
Who are 'them' who bear this burden of proof? Oeditpus Rex Oct 2025 #15
Those in authority Cirsium Oct 2025 #16
So, 'Those in authority' Oeditpus Rex Oct 2025 #17
You seem confused Cirsium Oct 2025 #19
And the burden of proof Oeditpus Rex Oct 2025 #21
No Cirsium Oct 2025 #22
Sigh... okay, I'll try it this way: Oeditpus Rex Oct 2025 #24
Seriously? Cirsium Oct 2025 #25
So... Oeditpus Rex Oct 2025 #29
You know it isn't Cirsium Oct 2025 #30
No, I do not know that Oeditpus Rex Oct 2025 #31
Wow! I just followed the Bluesky thread, yellow dahlia Oct 2025 #3
Will anyone ever get real evidence out of SC? SheltieLover Oct 2025 #26
I am expecting we can trust SLED more than the current FBI. yellow dahlia Oct 2025 #27
Well...isn't that convenient. paleotn Oct 2025 #6
Natural gas explosion? Just a coincidence it's the day after Miller trashes her Captain Zero Oct 2025 #18
K&R spanone Oct 2025 #7
K&R UTUSN Oct 2025 #14
I have not found a single reliable report that there was a pre-fire explosion. Ms. Toad Oct 2025 #23
Well........................................ BBbats Oct 2025 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Go against trump and get ...»Reply #25