General Discussion

Cirsium

(4,267 posts)

30. You know it isn't

Wed Oct 8, 2025, 07:24 PM

Oct 2025

I said the burden of proof is not on us. You disagreed. You thought we should have proof before we speculated that Trump's calls for violence against various people just might be connected somehow to actual violence against those he has targeted.

This is not as complicated as you are trying to make it out to be.

Trump is responsible, just as a parent is held responsible if their child is injured, just as a teacher or a day are worker or a nurse is held responsible for those in their care. Imagine if a nurse, or a teacher, or a parent were continually threatening the people over whom they had power, and the the ones they were threatening were in fact harmed.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Go against trump and get your house burned down...JFC... [View all] wcmagumba Oct 2025 OP

This message was self-deleted by its author Chasstev365 Oct 2025 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author WarGamer Oct 2025 #2

What a card you are! dpibel Oct 2025 #4

It's definitely on brand. BannonsLiver Oct 2025 #11

Are you also wary of people who dream up wild theories? WarGamer Oct 2025 #12

Wild theories? dpibel Oct 2025 #13

Of course. But in some cases they aren't theories. They're facts observed by others as well. BannonsLiver Oct 2025 #20

This message was self-deleted by its author ZZenith Oct 2025 #10

Yeah! Houses just blow up all the time. Especially when the occupant has just pissed off Donnie Dumbass! paleotn Oct 2025 #5

Oh stop it Cirsium Oct 2025 #8

Lots of good points in this post. calimary Oct 2025 #9

Who are 'them' who bear this burden of proof? Oeditpus Rex Oct 2025 #15

Those in authority Cirsium Oct 2025 #16

So, 'Those in authority' Oeditpus Rex Oct 2025 #17

You seem confused Cirsium Oct 2025 #19

And the burden of proof Oeditpus Rex Oct 2025 #21

No Cirsium Oct 2025 #22

Sigh... okay, I'll try it this way: Oeditpus Rex Oct 2025 #24

Seriously? Cirsium Oct 2025 #25

So... Oeditpus Rex Oct 2025 #29

You know it isn't Cirsium Oct 2025 #30

No, I do not know that Oeditpus Rex Oct 2025 #31

Wow! I just followed the Bluesky thread, yellow dahlia Oct 2025 #3

Will anyone ever get real evidence out of SC? SheltieLover Oct 2025 #26

I am expecting we can trust SLED more than the current FBI. yellow dahlia Oct 2025 #27

Well...isn't that convenient. paleotn Oct 2025 #6

Natural gas explosion? Just a coincidence it's the day after Miller trashes her Captain Zero Oct 2025 #18

K&R spanone Oct 2025 #7

K&R UTUSN Oct 2025 #14

I have not found a single reliable report that there was a pre-fire explosion. Ms. Toad Oct 2025 #23

Well........................................ BBbats Oct 2025 #28