General Discussion

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)

45. Why? Can you say honestly you will vote in that election?

Thu Dec 15, 2011, 08:59 AM

Dec 2011

Of course, you understand that policy is always on the table for discussion. You must. There is no rule under the sun that can make me or other good people start shouting agreement with 'one man, one woman' tripe. The President's opposition to equality is wrong, and we are not required to agree with all policy on DU. So get used to it. That policy is backward, ignorant, anti-science, bigoted, superstitious and foul. His last campaign included hate preachers who called gay people child killers, Sid. That will always get my strong reaction. I always stand against hate and slander of anyone, myself in particular. I'm funny that way. I stand up for my family no matter what some snarky poster wants to attempt to define as right and wrong from some other country.
Any person, such as the President, who opposes full equality for all minorities is an ignorant and bigoted fool. Those who, like Mr and Mrs Obama, shout Biblical excuses for their intolerance while simply ignoring the passages that apply to their own behaviors are also hypocrites of world class standing.
Folks who hold the coats for such policy are also unethical and frankly, not in line with DU policy, which is full support for equal rights for all, no matter what some political professional claims his religion is. He does not follow that religion, nor does h is wife. They make a gesture, some rhetoric. They simply reject the bulk of the teachings as written. They feel they are allowed to edit the Scriptures, and decide that some parts are no longer 'The Word of God' while the bits against others are 'Divine Law'.
His 'policy' is nonsensical rhetoric with words like 'Sanctity' and 'Sacrament' which carry no meaning in civil law.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

136 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I'd Like To Apologize To DU... [View all] WillyT Dec 2011 OP

If you had posted a single positive thing about the President geek tragedy Dec 2011 #1

Well, he might want to apologize to the truth, for so often mangling and destroying it. nt TheWraith Dec 2011 #3

OMG, my fingers were mere seconds from typing something similar Number23 Dec 2011 #7

And next week it will be yet another exercise in ott jefferson_dem Dec 2011 #15

I see DeathToTheOil Dec 2011 #31

You said it. secondwind Dec 2011 #92

OP gets small props for packaging the same "I don't like the POTUS" message in a different wrapper. CakeGrrl Dec 2011 #115

You Mean Voting For Him Wasn't Enough ??? WillyT Dec 2011 #9

You had an accountability moment in '08 noise Dec 2011 #10

No. It required more. Jakes Progress Dec 2011 #43

yep because every democratic president since the begining of the country has okieinpain Dec 2011 #67

Well. It's good to see that you finally understand. Jakes Progress Dec 2011 #95

dang it i forgot the sarcasm thingy okieinpain Dec 2011 #133

me too. Jakes Progress Dec 2011 #134

That was naive. randome Dec 2011 #59

are you keeping track? nt G_j Dec 2011 #70

Obama does something, Outrage comes out ... Never a Miscommunication. MjolnirTime Dec 2011 #73

3 Big Positives: Lilly Ledbetter, DADT repeal, two seemingly solid SC justices... ihavenobias Dec 2011 #90

Bingo! The winner. The OP has NEVER posted ANYTHING positive about President Obama. nt bluestate10 Dec 2011 #108

Re-#Occupy begins the 17th. Fire Walk With Me Dec 2011 #2

+100000! SammyWinstonJack Dec 2011 #4

Can we look forward to the Obama 2012 DUers UnrepentantLiberal Dec 2011 #33

wtf? Capn Sunshine Dec 2011 #111

I meant the ones who post here. UnrepentantLiberal Dec 2011 #112

To be fair, we all hoped to see the president truly stand up against this egregious Bush era sabrina 1 Dec 2011 #5

The President and his secret panel noise Dec 2011 #8

I did not know that Brittany Spears was a DUer MattBaggins Dec 2011 #16

I didn't either, can you point her out? Not a fan, but sabrina 1 Dec 2011 #101

Nah not you MattBaggins Dec 2011 #109

Lol, yes, I remember that ~ sabrina 1 Dec 2011 #110

Correction....they demand our unconditional trust. ooglymoogly Dec 2011 #102

Actually the person you are refering to who was killed might well still be alive cstanleytech Dec 2011 #88

Actually he wasn't fleeing, he was living in a country with a government that has proven itself sabrina 1 Dec 2011 #119

If anyone is telling you he is guilty its him in the many videos he kept filming cstanleytech Dec 2011 #120

Turn himself for what? Do people who have not been charged with any crime, generally just walk into sabrina 1 Dec 2011 #121

Actually you are right cstanleytech Dec 2011 #122

Actually ProSense Dec 2011 #6

I had a friend tell me if he did not veto this Mojorabbit Dec 2011 #12

At THIS Point... If The President Signs It, It May Be Decided By The Supreme Court... But... WillyT Dec 2011 #13

Please explain 'why' and 'what' in the bill would be decided by the Supreme Court. Tx4obama Dec 2011 #35

Certainly not someone sulphurdunn Dec 2011 #69

I read a lovely article on it earlier today. Mojorabbit Dec 2011 #84

Which could very well be what he wants since if he opposed it the onus would be on him cstanleytech Dec 2011 #89

Apology accepted. But don't let it happen again. styersc Dec 2011 #11

Good gracious. jefferson_dem Dec 2011 #14

And You Call Yourself A... WillyT Dec 2011 #19

Zee mask is off zee monster a simple pattern Dec 2011 #17

The true nature of the beast......rare footage indeed...thanks Magoo48 Dec 2011 #78

Welcome to the under-the-bus club! Odin2005 Dec 2011 #18

Proud Member !!! WillyT Dec 2011 #20

pretty soon ignore will be back and it wont be so much of an endurance feat xiamiam Dec 2011 #23

:) WillyT Dec 2011 #24

+1 Sherman A1 Dec 2011 #37

Here ya go! hifiguy Dec 2011 #48

Thank You Kindly Sherman A1 Dec 2011 #53

I always counted you as a member....I was surprised you ever counted yourself among the tpsbmam Dec 2011 #41

The 'my president, right or wrong' crowd is definitely riding in the bus, I prefer under the bus. RKP5637 Dec 2011 #71

How about some Teddy Roosevelt? Mnpaul Dec 2011 #105

Yep, I love it too, it's excellent and very appropriate. IMO we should always question the RKP5637 Dec 2011 #106

I'm seriously considering getting a tattoo of Javaman Dec 2011 #51

I can't wait for election season to officially begin...nt SidDithers Dec 2011 #21

I Feel Your Pain... WillyT Dec 2011 #22

Post removed Post removed Dec 2011 #26

I'm pretty sure those "critics" will silence themselves...nt SidDithers Dec 2011 #27

What do you expect to happen? joshcryer Dec 2011 #29

= "I have no substantive rebuttal to your OP." nt Bonobo Dec 2011 #34

Why? Can you say honestly you will vote in that election? Bluenorthwest Dec 2011 #45

LOL... SidDithers Dec 2011 #46

La La La La La .... LiberalLovinLug Dec 2011 #83

Hotlink fail... SidDithers Dec 2011 #85

He who lives in mirrorless houses……. 12AngryBorneoWildmen Dec 2011 #47

"...the President ... is an ignorant and bigoted fool" rinse, repeat. and repeat. and repeat. dionysus Dec 2011 #63

I've been there WillyT slay Dec 2011 #25

Think a lot of people thought the veto threat was to protect people, rather than executive power. DirkGently Dec 2011 #28

The best way to protect civil rights is to avoid war bhikkhu Dec 2011 #30

It declares America a part of the "battlefield" MedleyMisty Dec 2011 #40

No worries, mate pscot Dec 2011 #54

"nothing the bill provides for is worse than what was done before" ... Oh REALLY??? bvar22 Dec 2011 #77

That may be the worst defense for FDR's internment of Japanese-Americans onenote Dec 2011 #80

....And your post may be the Worst Strawman EVER posted at DU. bvar22 Dec 2011 #94

It is sad that I have to come to the defence of FDR even to another ooglymoogly Dec 2011 #104

Comparing FDR, a legally elected president, ooglymoogly Dec 2011 #113

NO, WillyT! Zorra Dec 2011 #32

So much for closing Gitmo Jim_Shorts Dec 2011 #36

Great post malaise Dec 2011 #38

Great post, WillyT MissDeeds Dec 2011 #39

"Make No Mistake: I pledge to never use these powers to imprison Americans MannyGoldstein Dec 2011 #42

And job creators. Jakes Progress Dec 2011 #44

Free WillyT! slackmaster Dec 2011 #49

I hear ya boomerbust Dec 2011 #50

No need... welcome to the real Underground! fascisthunter Dec 2011 #52

I WANT MY IGNORE FEATURE BACK PLEASE n/t sharp_stick Dec 2011 #55

FYI, it's back! go into a users profile and the ignore button is back. dionysus Dec 2011 #60

Wow! I didn't know that you could be unquestionably true to Democratic principles and post this. AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2011 #56

When do we get the ignore feature installed on DU3? Ian David Dec 2011 #57

it's back.. open up a posters profile and there's an ignore option. dionysus Dec 2011 #61

Thanks! n/t Ian David Dec 2011 #64

i've been told the button is there but non functional yet.. hope i didn't get your hopes up. dionysus Dec 2011 #76

Good Lord! Read the actual bill as passed! Unca Jim Dec 2011 #58

I did read the bill "as passed" SomethingFishy Dec 2011 #81

the melodrama.. runs deep. dionysus Dec 2011 #62

I deeply regret not emigrating when I had opportunities in my 20s and 30s Lydia Leftcoast Dec 2011 #65

the audacity! nt G_j Dec 2011 #66

make that unionworks Dec 2011 #68

This slipped between sulphurdunn Dec 2011 #72

Yup, he gave up any chance to be great and settled for "marginally better than them" mistertrickster Dec 2011 #74

The FDR who illegally rounded up and imprisoned tens of thousands of Americans NYC Liberal Dec 2011 #82

Could you imagine what DU would be like if FDR were president today... SidDithers Dec 2011 #93

A lot of us wouldn't have time to worry about posting on the internet mistertrickster Dec 2011 #99

I knew someone would mention that. Apples to oranges. mistertrickster Dec 2011 #98

Pearl Harbor did not justify illegally imprisoning over 100,000 Japanese Americans NYC Liberal Dec 2011 #107

Of course . . . I'm not arguing that it was justified. mistertrickster Dec 2011 #116

And some of (or more likely, a lot of) the people at Guantanamo are actually terrorists. NYC Liberal Dec 2011 #117

My point was not about the indefinite detention. It was about Obama blowing his chance to be great mistertrickster Dec 2011 #118

I read it as exempting U.S. citizens from being required to be detained indefintely mvd Dec 2011 #75

Post removed Post removed Dec 2011 #79

alert got root Dec 2011 #87

& 2nd-ed. nt mistertrickster Dec 2011 #100

Why? Why won't it happen again? mmonk Dec 2011 #86

Have you found the Higgs Boson? RoccoR5955 Dec 2011 #91

CERN likely did find it. girl gone mad Dec 2011 #97

How could Anatos Dec 2011 #124

I resent that statement. RoccoR5955 Dec 2011 #125

Dennis Kucinich Anatos Dec 2011 #126

I believe that you should look at Kucinich a bit closer. RoccoR5955 Dec 2011 #127

Too long, but I read it anyway. Anatos Dec 2011 #128

Addendum Anatos Dec 2011 #130

A few points. RoccoR5955 Dec 2011 #131

First of all Anatos Dec 2011 #132

Here's a quote for you: RoccoR5955 Dec 2011 #135

Right back at ya, Guy. Anatos Dec 2011 #136

This message was self-deleted by its author Itchinjim Dec 2011 #96

I have tears in my eyes Generic Other Dec 2011 #103

KR Excellent post WillyT to the consternation of many. eom ooglymoogly Dec 2011 #114

Go cry in your soup in a corner Anatos Dec 2011 #123

So which candidate do you think is in agreement with all your views? Honeycombe8 Dec 2011 #129