Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Re: James Comey [View all]

yellow dahlia

(6,599 posts)
10. Thanks for the well thought out analysis.
Thu Oct 9, 2025, 03:17 PM
Oct 2025

I agree with you - there were a lot of variables at play in 2016. I posit that Comey may have been manipulated by some of those variables.

Does Comey have different biases than me? Perhaps. Do I find some of his personality traits annoying? Perhaps. But that does not mean I should paint him as an evil bad guy and blame him for what happened in 2016? I don't think so. He is human, like all of us.

I have opinions about the behavior of Wasserman-Schulz and the DNC, as well.

I applaud your research. Here is more about the forces at work behind the scenes in the 2016 election. Charles McGonigle, at the FBI New York field office, may have played a very significant role in helping to sway the election. He was working with Rudy Giuliani, He had connections to the Russians in the background. It is likely that Comey spoke up at one point because he knew a leak from the NY field office was forthcoming. It is possible McConigle was behind the leak to NY Times, which led to an erroneous front page spread on Oct. 31, citing unnamed “intelligence sources,” the Times reported, “Investigating Donald Trump, F.B.I. Sees No Clear Link to Russia.”

In October of 2023, the Philadelphia Inquirer published an article, written by Will Bunch, entitled: "The NYT should tell readers whether it helped crooked FBI agents get Trump elected in 2016". The subtitle of the article was "[T]he arrest of a high-level FBI agent on Russia-tied corruption charges raises stunning new questions about how Trump really won in 2016".

The first paragraph reads: "It was arguably the most consequential “October Surprise” in the history of American presidential elections. In the waning days of the 2016 race, with polls showing Hillary Clinton clinging to a lead over Donald Trump, two last-minute stories broke that rekindled on-the-fence voters’ ethical doubts about Democrat Clinton and quashed a budding scandal around her GOP rival." Here is an archived link to the full article. https://archive.ph/uTMbc

There were a lot of forces at play in the 2016 election.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Re: James Comey [View all] H2O Man Oct 2025 OP
I too am equivocal about Comey. But, I am convinced if ANYONE CAN defend against & expose Trump's vendetta-only hlthe2b Oct 2025 #1
Thank you! H2O Man Oct 2025 #5
Agree 100% malaise Oct 2025 #6
Agreed. Right now he is on Team Rule of Law. yellow dahlia Oct 2025 #11
The Republican Party always has an October surprise. PurgedVoter Oct 2025 #2
I agree. H2O Man Oct 2025 #7
Thanks for that. yellow dahlia Oct 2025 #15
Thank you thank you thank you Nictuku Oct 2025 #3
Right. H2O Man Oct 2025 #8
It is very similar with those against Garland, minds are made up regardless of facts. Bev54 Oct 2025 #12
Absolutely! H2O Man Oct 2025 #20
I still think... Chemical Bill Oct 2025 #4
Exactly! H2O Man Oct 2025 #9
Thanks for the well thought out analysis. yellow dahlia Oct 2025 #10
Thank you. H2O Man Oct 2025 #17
Early in 2017 canetoad Oct 2025 #13
I found this. yellow dahlia Oct 2025 #16
Not the same article canetoad Oct 2025 #23
Ah. Thanks. yellow dahlia Oct 2025 #24
Yes, I remember. H2O Man Oct 2025 #19
Correction: Comey OVERRULED the black woman that was his superior. W_HAMILTON Oct 2025 #14
Wrong. H2O Man Oct 2025 #18
NOT wrong -- and I have the receipts. W_HAMILTON Oct 2025 #21
Because I like and respect you, H2O Man Oct 2025 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Re: James Comey»Reply #10