Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(54,622 posts)
52. the article
Fri Oct 10, 2025, 03:40 PM
Oct 2025

https://archive.ph/J2XY

Jan. 15 (Bloomberg) -- Few products have been launched with such a blizzard of publicity as Apple Inc.'s iPhone.
To its many fans, Apple is more of a religious cult than a company. An iToaster that downloads music while toasting bread would probably get the same kind of worldwide attention. Don't let that fool you into thinking that it matters. The big competitors in the mobile-phone industry such as Nokia Oyj and Motorola Inc. won't be whispering nervously into their clamshells over a new threat to their business. The iPhone is nothing more than a luxury bauble that will appeal to a few gadget freaks. In terms of its impact on the industry, the iPhone is less relevant.

If column inches and airtime guaranteed commercial success, Apple would already have a global hit on its hands. For the past week, it has been impossible to open a newspaper or look at a Web site without reading something about the shiny new phone. Certainly, it looks like a nice piece of equipment. The iPhone combines Apple's iPod music and video player with a mobile phone as well as having wireless Internet access for e-mail. Instead of lugging around a phone for making calls, an MP3 player for listening to music, and a Blackberry for checking your e- mail, you can do all three on one device. Even better, you only need one charger. It will be released in the U.S. in June, with a rollout to the rest of the world later, and will cost $499 to $599, depending on how much storage space you want. How many might they sell? Ten million in 2008, according to Apple Chief Executive Officer Steve Jobs.

Three Reasons

Not everyone is sold on the idea. ``The iPhone will not substantially alter the fundamental structure and challenges of the mobile industry,'' Charles Golvin, an analyst at Forrester Research Inc., said in a report this month. There are three reasons that Apple is unlikely to make much of an impact on this market -- and why it is too early to start dumping your Nokia shares.

First, Apple is late to this party. The company didn't invent the personal computer or MP3 player, but it was among the pioneers of both products. Yet there is no shortage of phones out there. There are already big companies that dominate the space, all of whom will defend their turf. That means Apple will have to fight hard for every sale. Next, the mobile-phone industry depends on cooperation with the big networks. Phones -- the high-end ones in particular --are usually sold with a network contract. The provider subsidizes the handset in the U.K. and hopes to recoup its money with ridiculously expensive charges for calls and data. Yet Apple has never been good at working with other companies. If it knew how to do that, it would be Microsoft Corp.

snip

It won't come from the iPhone. Apple will sell a few to its fans, but the iPhone won't make a long-term mark on the industry.

(Matthew Lynn is a Bloomberg News columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.)



Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Two reasons: 1) Staggered changing tariffs smeared the effect. 2) Massive uncertainty. . . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2025 #1
This is a very pro-Trump column. yardwork Oct 2025 #2
Looking thru a partisan lens it might be. Mosby Oct 2025 #4
I don't see any evidence of hysteria on the part of economists. yardwork Oct 2025 #8
This article is poorly written propaganda. Dawson Leery Oct 2025 #5
Matthew Lynn is a financial columnist and author. He writes for the Daily Telegraph and the Spectator in London. Celerity Oct 2025 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author Skittles Oct 2025 #40
JFC Skittles Oct 2025 #39
Read on! yardwork Oct 2025 #41
*SNORT* Skittles Oct 2025 #44
Way too early to celebrate being wrong. Savings KPN Oct 2025 #3
It's darker than cheerleading. yardwork Oct 2025 #12
Post removed Post removed Oct 2025 #14
Who is Lawrence? yardwork Oct 2025 #16
O'Donnell. Mosby Oct 2025 #19
Lawrence O'Donnell is not an economist. yardwork Oct 2025 #20
He has a degree in economics from Harvard. Mosby Oct 2025 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Oct 2025 #24
lol. I have an undergraduate degree in history but I am not a historian. yardwork Oct 2025 #26
'Liberation Day' in retrospect: 6 things that surprised investors Mosby Oct 2025 #13
The stock market isn't the economy for the average KPN Oct 2025 #49
I don't think FAFO sentiment is the same as "celebrating" Skittles Oct 2025 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Oct 2025 #6
WaPo is running a lot of Trump propaganda these days. yardwork Oct 2025 #9
because it is, see post 15 Celerity Oct 2025 #18
The rich can ride some of the effects out.................... Lovie777 Oct 2025 #7
So foreign manufacturers are lowering their prices? Bmoboy Oct 2025 #10
Bullshit edhopper Oct 2025 #11
We're still very early in the game. Wednesdays Oct 2025 #17
This is BS because he backed off a lot of tariffs, or lowered them drastically. OrlandoDem2 Oct 2025 #21
I am pretty sure this story is slanted in more than one way BootinUp Oct 2025 #23
This is an opinion piece written by a conservative writer who backed brexit and who gives TSF lots wiggs Oct 2025 #25
The US economy was so strong it withstood a huge major grifting operation by Trump. Irish_Dem Oct 2025 #27
This is the guy who predicted in a 2007 Bloomberg article that the iPhone would be a flop. Ocelot II Oct 2025 #28
the article Celerity Oct 2025 #52
Thanks! Ocelot II Oct 2025 #53
yw Celerity Oct 2025 #54
Supply chains and pricing has not fully adjusted yet. bucolic_frolic Oct 2025 #29
Post removed Post removed Oct 2025 #30
I didn't alert but this column really is nothing but right wing talking points. yardwork Oct 2025 #34
They haven't been fully implemented, and temporarily companies have been lostincalifornia Oct 2025 #31
The Gatekeepers have arrived. Kingofalldems Oct 2025 #32
Krugman had a post about this today Krazy_Kat Oct 2025 #33
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Oct 2025 #37
He makes some good points. Mosby Oct 2025 #38
Let's See What Shareholders Say DallasNE Oct 2025 #56
This column is what is sometimes referred to as an "absolute pant load". BannonsLiver Oct 2025 #35
The comments from WaPo readers concur. yardwork Oct 2025 #36
Stagflation DallasNE Oct 2025 #42
Why are we allowing right wing bullshit like this to be posted here? I thought it was against the rules. Wiz Imp Oct 2025 #43
Same here. Kingofalldems Oct 2025 #46
Wrong about WHICH tariffs? DFW Oct 2025 #47
DOW -750 NASDAQ -695 S&P -155 Emile Oct 2025 #48
For those who thought that the author of this article was full of shit, but weren't sure, this should clinch it. Wiz Imp Oct 2025 #50
WAPO OP/ED page is a hard R now obamanut2012 Oct 2025 #51
Trump DELAYED most of the tariffs, so there is no 6months in blm Oct 2025 #55
Thank you for the having the courage to post this - at the risk of being flamed, I'm not surprised at all by this. Midwestern Democrat Oct 2025 #57
You could read Krugman and learn a few things. BootinUp Oct 2025 #59
There seems to be an agenda here Keepthesoulalive Oct 2025 #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Economists were wrong abo...»Reply #52