Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I asked ChatGPT to rewrite "American Pie" to be more contemporary... [View all]WhiskeyGrinder
(26,092 posts)13. Boring and vague. Not a fan of the original, but at least the wordplay and references in it mean something.
But then, thats what you get with autofill that wrecks the environment. Not worth it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I asked ChatGPT to rewrite "American Pie" to be more contemporary... [View all]
Layzeebeaver
Oct 11
OP
Your use of ChatGPT is unethical, if you're aware of the many news stories and the many posts here
highplainsdem
Oct 11
#7
Yes. Of course. It would be your own work. The difference is obvious. Just as there's an obvious
highplainsdem
Oct 11
#11
Please look up the meaning of "understudy" because you obviously don't know it.
highplainsdem
Oct 11
#49
No, it isn't. If you're using AI without being forced to do so by your job or school, and you're aware
highplainsdem
Oct 11
#43
If you'd talked to the near-suicidal artists, writers and teachers (who see their students being dumbed down)
highplainsdem
Oct 12
#56
Write it yourself. Don't use an unethical tool trained on stolen intellectual property.
highplainsdem
Oct 11
#8
Stop being so silly. No one suggested that. I love tech that actually helps, and I had an HP laser printer
highplainsdem
Oct 11
#44
You don't want it stealing YOUR stuff, but you're fine with it being trained on all the writing by other people
highplainsdem
Oct 11
#45
Exactly. And there's nothing creative about having genAI do something for you.
highplainsdem
Oct 11
#47
The people who'll be hurt by AI tools that dumb them down are not the ones refusing to participate
highplainsdem
Oct 11
#46
Boring and vague. Not a fan of the original, but at least the wordplay and references in it mean something.
WhiskeyGrinder
Oct 11
#13
Damage to the envirinment is just one of a number of harms from genAI and the data centers being
highplainsdem
Oct 11
#17
There's no way to use genAI built on theft ethically. That's like saying you'll use slave labor ethically.
highplainsdem
Oct 11
#22
We can try to prevent worse from happening, or we can let it happen by saying "we've already come so far, why not
WhiskeyGrinder
Oct 11
#19
Fighting for open-mindedness? About something that reduces creativity, reduces brain activity, plagiarizes art
WhiskeyGrinder
Oct 11
#24
An inspiration by itself isn't music, or a book, or a painting. Just having an idea does not entitle you
highplainsdem
Oct 11
#48
Ethics is not a separate topic. It's inherent when this tech exists only because of stolen IP. The fact
highplainsdem
Oct 12
#59