Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Why Columbus Day was not about Columbus. [View all]
Repost.
"Columbus Day" had to do with anti-immigrant (anti-Italian) hate and violence, and was a demand by the Italian government to make some kind of amends for the lynching of 11 immigrants.
"Columbus Day" was a means, not an end. It actually helped end racist immigration restrictions in 1965.
Colonialism is wrong. Racism is wrong. Hating on immigrants is wrong, and they all factor in.
How Italians Became White
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/10/12/opinion/columbus-day-italian-american-racism.html
Vicious bigotry, reluctant acceptance: an American story.
11 Italian-Americans were lynched by a mob in New Orleans. You know, "dirty immigrants"
President Harrison would have ignored the New Orleans carnage had the victims been black. But the Italian government made that impossible. It broke off diplomatic relations and demanded an indemnity that the Harrison administration paid. Harrison even called on Congress in his 1891 State of the Union to protect foreign nationals though not black Americans from mob violence.
Harrisons Columbus Day proclamation in 1892 opened the door for Italian-Americans to write themselves into the American origin story, in a fashion that piled myth upon myth. As the historian Danielle Battisti shows in Whom We Shall Welcome, they rewrote history by casting Columbus as the first immigrant even though he never set foot in North America and never immigrated anywhere (except possibly to Spain), and even though the United States did not exist as a nation during his 15th-century voyage.
Snip
The New Orleans lynching solidified a defamatory view of Italians generally, and Sicilians in particular, as irredeemable criminals who represented a danger to the nation. The influential anti-immigrant racist Representative Henry Cabot Lodge of Massachusetts, soon to join the United States Senate, quickly appropriated the event. He argued that a lack of confidence in juries, not mob violence, had been the real problem in New Orleans. Lawlessness and lynching are evil things, he wrote, but a popular belief that juries cannot be trusted is even worse.
Facts aside, Lodge argued, beliefs about immigrants were in themselves sufficient to warrant higher barriers to immigration. Congress ratified that notion during the 1920s, curtailing Italian immigration on racial grounds, even though Italians were legally white, with all of the rights whiteness entailed. Italian-Americans labored in the campaign that overturned racist immigration restrictions in 1965
Harrisons Columbus Day proclamation in 1892 opened the door for Italian-Americans to write themselves into the American origin story, in a fashion that piled myth upon myth. As the historian Danielle Battisti shows in Whom We Shall Welcome, they rewrote history by casting Columbus as the first immigrant even though he never set foot in North America and never immigrated anywhere (except possibly to Spain), and even though the United States did not exist as a nation during his 15th-century voyage.
Snip
The New Orleans lynching solidified a defamatory view of Italians generally, and Sicilians in particular, as irredeemable criminals who represented a danger to the nation. The influential anti-immigrant racist Representative Henry Cabot Lodge of Massachusetts, soon to join the United States Senate, quickly appropriated the event. He argued that a lack of confidence in juries, not mob violence, had been the real problem in New Orleans. Lawlessness and lynching are evil things, he wrote, but a popular belief that juries cannot be trusted is even worse.
Facts aside, Lodge argued, beliefs about immigrants were in themselves sufficient to warrant higher barriers to immigration. Congress ratified that notion during the 1920s, curtailing Italian immigration on racial grounds, even though Italians were legally white, with all of the rights whiteness entailed. Italian-Americans labored in the campaign that overturned racist immigration restrictions in 1965
and they're back.
I'm following up this post with a big reminder from Indivisible.
Opinion:
We fight in the present to make a great future.
History is sometimes used as a learning tool. Most often, it's used to create grievance and vengeance, things that divide. Let's be INDIVISIBLE in the cause of justice, equality, dignity of all people and fairness.
See an argument against division here:
https://defragzone.substack.com/p/the-engineering-problem-with-democracy
The Beautiful Lie of Division: How Were Being Kept Apart
Second, we start looking for common ground instead of differences. What do you and your opponent actually want? Strip away the labels, the team jerseys, the talking points. What do you both need to live a decent life? Probably the same things: safety, security, dignity, opportunity, health, a future for your kids. The inputs might look different, but the desired outputs are remarkably similar.
...
Believe me, theyre not afraid of you being wrong. Theyre afraid of you being united. A society that disagrees about everything poses no threat. A society that agrees on even one or two fundamental things? Thats a revolution waiting to happen. Thats a system failure from their perspective. Thats game over.
So they keep us arguing about breakfast. About sports teams. About which billionaire is slightly less terrible than the other billionaire. About pronouns and statues and who gets to use which bathroom. And while were busy with all that, the game continues above our heads, unchanged and unchallenged.
You dont have to agree with your neighbor about everything. You dont have to share their religion, their diet, their politics, or their taste in music. But you might want to ask yourself: what do we agree on? Because thats where the power is. Thats what theyre afraid of. Thats the exploit in the system they never patched.
...
Believe me, theyre not afraid of you being wrong. Theyre afraid of you being united. A society that disagrees about everything poses no threat. A society that agrees on even one or two fundamental things? Thats a revolution waiting to happen. Thats a system failure from their perspective. Thats game over.
So they keep us arguing about breakfast. About sports teams. About which billionaire is slightly less terrible than the other billionaire. About pronouns and statues and who gets to use which bathroom. And while were busy with all that, the game continues above our heads, unchanged and unchallenged.
You dont have to agree with your neighbor about everything. You dont have to share their religion, their diet, their politics, or their taste in music. But you might want to ask yourself: what do we agree on? Because thats where the power is. Thats what theyre afraid of. Thats the exploit in the system they never patched.
Play to win a grocery store argument, or play to win the power to defeat excessive greed, racism, hate and division.
And by the way.

You must choose wisely.
🇺🇸🇮🇹
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies