General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: American Taliban: Women have no right to their own bodies, but they're responsible for HIS [View all]ProfessionalLeftist
(4,982 posts)him to fire the woman. Ridiculous. Not knowing the history of their marriage, I have to wonder why the wife is so insecure and feels she cannot trust her husband so much that she wanted to force him to fire an employee. And I have to wonder how or why a marriage that has no more trust in it than that can survive, attractive dental asst or none. IOW, I don't think, still, the dental asst is the problem. Why should she have to be made to pay for this issue with her job? She did nothing wrong. HE did.
When a man/men/company can fire a woman for simply being a woman or being attractive, that's Taliban as hell. And it's unacceptable that the IA supreme court (all male) agreed with the decision is particularly unacceptable.
The woman herself is married with 2 kids and she made no advances towards him nor did she respond to his suggestive texts. SHE did not do a damn thing wrong. By all accounts, she was a good employee.
HE texted her asking "how often she experienced an orgasm." HE is the one who feared HE would "have an affair" if he didn't fire the woman.
The problem was with HIM, not her. The man has issues. Too bad Nelson had to pay for HIS issues with HER job.
Jeeze.