General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Big Dog's Big Lie [View all]nolabels
(13,133 posts)I don't have the greatest memory but there is really no place i see that he put forth anything on initiative. His greatest asset was getting others to compromise to make things work for him. That's management
There is difference between both parties and sometimes (or many times) its almost seems genetic. The problem is the ones that get to the top are the ones that have gotten approval by the wealthy to be there. Management works for the money, leaders work for a better way
Clinton is and was brilliant in many ways and no fault of him that the country went where it did. The inevitable was and is that money wanted it's way and got it when bush* was in office. No doubt it was better when Clinton was is office to hold that nasty thing off till that later time.
The idea of the false narrative sounds kind of crazy to me. That idea also seems like your idea first off and secondly if they couldn't be compared why would you want bring that up. They are not the same but i think it wouldn't be ignorant to think they were helped greatly by an agreement by many wealthy people who want to hold on their wealth. Perhaps you might compare that.
It's not the money though, it's what people who have it feel they must do with it. We have to change the ideas, the circumstances that surround them (if bad) where just somebody else's bad ideas.