Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,761 posts)
61. Yes and no
Fri Oct 24, 2025, 07:46 PM
Oct 2025

I'll often see an attorney's opinion cited in a debate here on some constitutional issue only to find that they specialize in family law or real estate law. Those are perfectly respectable professions, but the writer may have only taken a single semester of con law two or three decades ago. I often find that student I coach for moot court have a superior understanding of the issues involved than the person being cited as authoritative... despite lacking a law degree (or even an undergraduate degree at that point).

Kerr is the COO of an architecture firm that appears only to do home construction and home improvement projects. His graduate degrees are in business and operations management. That's entirely appropriate for his position, but the people in the firm actively doing architechture work have their advanced degrees in architecture... and even then I would take with a grain of salt their opinions on federal building cost estimates.

The more recent illustrations posted here are from McCrery Architects. McCrery is a professor of architecture at CU in DC who specializes in classic architecture and has worked on the US Capitol, the Capitol here in NC, and the Supreme Court.

Kerr is drawing conclusions on far too little data. He's already taken down the original images when he realized that they were discredited. He "stands by" his analysis... but it's demonstrably outside of his area of expertise.

As a simple example - consider his statement "the cost per square foot would be $3,333. No building costs anywhere near that. $1,000/sf is astronomical." Then consider the recent debate over renovations for the Federal Reserve HQ building that are currently underway. Trump was lambasting Powell over how wasteful the spending was and most of us here took the opposite position. Well... that's a $2.5 Billion dollar project... which renovates 402k sqft and expands an additional 440k sqft. That's $3k/sqft and half of it is renovation... not demolition and new construction.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Great info, great post. Permanut Oct 2025 #1
So what is the hypothesis? intrepidity Oct 2025 #2
Maybe a new grift? Raven123 Oct 2025 #23
a huge grift. the oompa loompa isn't sartisfied w/ the money he's already made selling his coins + nft's. pansypoo53219 Oct 2025 #40
3 levels IbogaProject Oct 2025 #55
The destruction of the East Wing is real. sop Oct 2025 #3
This Layzeebeaver Oct 2025 #73
They are playing a $300.million project by ear. Klarkashton Oct 2025 #4
Embezzlement Diraven Oct 2025 #27
Well, Not Exactly "By Ear," More Like by the Seat of His Soiled Diaper The Roux Comes First Oct 2025 #32
Once the east wing was destroyed... ananda Oct 2025 #45
"What is this, a center for ants?" leftstreet Oct 2025 #5
Great movie orangecrush Oct 2025 #37
I would bet that there are numerous below-grade levels planned. maxsolomon Oct 2025 #6
"No markodochartaigh Oct 2025 #7
Here we go!!! NJCher Oct 2025 #8
How nice of you to claim Andrew Kerr is not real. Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2025 #30
I don't think NJCher is saying Mr Kerr AllyCat Oct 2025 #46
She says when the "REAL architects" speak up, as if Kerr is not real Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2025 #51
Yes and no FBaggins Oct 2025 #61
You make some good points and lay them out well. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2025 #64
still trying to figure out how to grift most of it back into his own pocket eShirl Oct 2025 #9
Trump hired the contractor popsdenver Oct 2025 #50
Seems like typical Facebook nonsense FBaggins Oct 2025 #10
NYT article gifted for you Ellipsis Oct 2025 #16
The WH has supplied a couple of renderings ("drawing" in your language). No idea what illustration FB has. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2025 #28
"Drawings" was Kerr's label. I just adopted it in my response on that point. FBaggins Oct 2025 #62
You're the one spouting nonsense. Wiz Imp Oct 2025 #53
Its been brought up elsewhere that tRumps ballroom exactlly mirrors putins ballroom in russia though its 5% bigger so yaesu Oct 2025 #11
Yeah... that was mostly nonsense FBaggins Oct 2025 #21
Don't bring facts and truth into a good meme lol... WarGamer Oct 2025 #39
Post removed Post removed Oct 2025 #57
The reason the price keeps going up daily Gaugamela Oct 2025 #12
It will be built as cheaply as possible. Trump will pocket the extra money from the oligarchs' donations (bribes) Ocelot II Oct 2025 #19
Exactly. Gaugamela Oct 2025 #20
Yes the billionaires are standing in line waiting to throw money at it FakeNoose Oct 2025 #24
I had wondered about that cost per square foot dsc Oct 2025 #13
Chirst, now trump even has architects questioning whether building was destroyed and is being rebuilt to trump's specs. Silent Type Oct 2025 #14
Very good chance the open wound will fester for months or years. Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2025 #25
Most likely redoing the bunker under it to be more up to date nt EX500rider Oct 2025 #15
Good idea Diraven Oct 2025 #29
That's what I think; they're going deep. thought crime Oct 2025 #38
Even a bunker won't survive a Ground Zero strike from a Russian nuclear ground burst EX500rider Oct 2025 #44
And there is also a water table issue to an extent obamanut2012 Oct 2025 #59
That's true Diraven Oct 2025 #69
So said Thom Hartmann vapor2 Oct 2025 #60
So it's a concept of a plan? Ocelot II Oct 2025 #17
Just like health care. Ellipsis Oct 2025 #18
So "sick f*ck" is now a legitimate measurement? BaronChocula Oct 2025 #22
At a minimum, 50-60% of the cost is going into Trump's pocket. Scalded Nun Oct 2025 #26
Building a throne room then? cstanleytech Oct 2025 #31
Historian Doug Brinkley this a.m. on Morning Joe, got heated up about this allegorical oracle Oct 2025 #33
Bottom line: NCDem47 Oct 2025 #34
He left out a critical part... WarGamer Oct 2025 #35
Wrong about what exactly? obamanut2012 Oct 2025 #52
about cost estimates... WarGamer Oct 2025 #65
All Chump wants to do is look at the carpet samples FakeNoose Oct 2025 #66
Very interesting.... viva la Oct 2025 #36
I clicked on the FB link and got a page that said, "Sorry, this content isn't available right now." ShazzieB Oct 2025 #41
He might have changed privileges Ellipsis Oct 2025 #42
That's okay. ShazzieB Oct 2025 #67
Posted to another DU thread earlier today: evolves Oct 2025 #43
Also gives whomever wants to target WH a great view of the rebuild... blue_jay Oct 2025 #47
Fake ballroom... dlk Oct 2025 #48
Because it is a scam misanthrope Oct 2025 #49
The Epstein Ball Room Emile Oct 2025 #54
Add it to the list of impeachable offenses Bluestocking Oct 2025 #56
The Epstein Ballroom and Casino will never be completed. I doubt if the construction phase will actually begin. Ford_Prefect Oct 2025 #58
Facebook link sez "content not available"..... n/t Dixiegrrrl Oct 2025 #63
Don't forget the bunker. scipan Oct 2025 #68
By the numbers - 90,000 sq. ft. is 2.07 acres. flashman13 Oct 2025 #70
For a single-story building FBaggins Oct 2025 #72
The Epstein Ballroom only exists in Trump's mind SARose Oct 2025 #71
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Andrew Kerr- Architect - ...»Reply #61