Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
24. Politically yes
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 07:52 PM
Dec 2012

I do not think the Democratic base will forgive anyone who supports this running in 2014, and some Dems will go so far as to defect from the party itself. That means less support and less contribution to those Dems remaining. This is not the casual cut supporters paint it to be. The research I did on this issue last year showed a Boomer retiring in 2011 who collected Social Security 25 years would lose $18,000. It seems like a small loss at the beginning, but when one factors in the current CPI does not reflect Boomer expenses, and then add in continuing loss in COLAs over the Boomer's lifetime, it is thousands Boomers lose.

And the gross outrage of this controversy is that this is what Republicans demand, Social Security and other entitlement cuts. It was their guy, George W. Bush* whose policies continue yet to impact our economy adversely. Republicans say we cannot blame President Obama's predecessor (despite the fact he dug this tremendous financial hole for all American citizens....) but we must make cuts in earned benefits (which they call entitlements) to offset Bush's 10.5 Trillion Dollar Deficit (the number at hand he kept off record when he departed the Oval Office). And some Dems are ready to give Republicans this -- cuts in Social Security to pay for the unfunded Iraq War and other prongs of the Bush* residency in office. I don't think so.

Sam

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

eridani you are SO right. xtraxritical Dec 2012 #1
I agree but ... copperearth Dec 2012 #2
The best way to shore up Social Security is to get our Living Wage Jobs back into this country. RC Dec 2012 #4
Actually, SS is probably fine MannyGoldstein Dec 2012 #5
OK let me ask you something here RE: shoring up Social Security....... socialist_n_TN Dec 2012 #7
socialist_n_TN donnasgirl Dec 2012 #8
Yeah, that's what I suspected happened....... socialist_n_TN Dec 2012 #13
donnasgirl, please put a space after each comma (two spaces after each period) Skittles Dec 2012 #16
did you ever think donnasgirl Dec 2012 #22
it's not small crap to want to read posts Skittles Dec 2012 #23
Look donnasgirl Dec 2012 #25
gee Skittles Dec 2012 #26
The excess built up into the Social Security Trust Fund, which is now about 2.6 Trillion Dollars Samantha Dec 2012 #14
If either Repulicans or Democrata touch SS they are dead. xtraxritical Dec 2012 #15
Politically yes Samantha Dec 2012 #24
The rich do not want to pay taxes at the higher rates that were effective during our prime working JDPriestly Dec 2012 #18
It is a false crisis and a way to stick it to the working class for the sins of coalition_unwilling Dec 2012 #19
A big holiday welcome to you truedelphi Dec 2012 #9
Raise the cap ashling Dec 2012 #10
Seniors stayed away from the polls in 2010 allowing the GOP the house. Some people Vincardog Dec 2012 #3
Are tea partiers against the chained CPI? nt Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #6
Nearly all of America is against cuts to the safety nets. madfloridian Dec 2012 #12
Excellent Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2012 #11
K&R. Truer words were never spoken. JDPriestly Dec 2012 #17
What part of "third rail" do these fools fail to understand? Fumesucker Dec 2012 #20
If we allow Dems to cut off the electricity, we are fucked eridani Dec 2012 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Note to Incumbents on Soc...»Reply #24