Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
39. Bernie Sanders on the Chained CPI:
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 08:31 PM
Dec 2012
STATEMENT BY SENATOR BERNARD SANDERS ON THE CHAINED-CPI

We are here today to tell the White House and the leadership in Congress: do not balance the budget on the backs of disabled veterans who have lost their arms, legs, and eyesight defending our country.

Do not balance the budget on the backs of the men and women who have already sacrificed for us in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Do not balance the budget on the backs of the wives, husbands, and children of those who have made the ultimate sacrifice.

And, do not balance the budget on the backs of the men and women who served our country in World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War, and other conflicts by cutting Social Security benefits.
Do not adopt the so-called chained-CPI.

My Republican friends and some Democrats have said that lowering Cost-Of-Living Adjustments (COLAs) through the adoption of a chained-CPI would be a “minor tweak” in benefits.

But, let’s be clear: for millions of disabled veterans and seniors living on fixed incomes, the chained CPI is not a minor tweak. It is a significant benefit cut that will make it harder for permanently disabled veterans and the elderly to feed their families, heat their homes, pay for their prescription drugs, and make ends meet. This misguided proposal must be vigorously opposed.

Supporters of the chained-CPI want the American people to believe that the COLAs that disabled veterans, senior citizens, and the surviving spouses and children who have lost loved ones in combat are too generous.

That is simply not true. In two out of the last three years, disabled veterans and senior citizens did not receive any COLA. And, next year’s COLA of 1.7% is one of the lowest ever. Lowering COLAs even further through the adoption of a chained-CPI would be an absolute disaster.

This nation has made a commitment to our military and our veterans: if you get permanently disabled defending this country, if you get seriously wounded in battle, we will always be there for you. The Veterans Administration will provide you with the disability compensation benefits you need to live in dignity and those benefits will keep pace with inflation.
Today, more than 3.2 million disabled veterans receive disability compensation benefits from the Veterans Administration.

Under the chained CPI, a disabled veteran who started receiving VA disability benefits at age 30 would have their benefits cut by more than $1,400 at age 45; $2,300 at age 55; and $3,200 at age 65.

I challenge anyone who supports a chained-CPI, to go to Walter Reed. Visit with the men and women who have lost their legs, lost their arms, lost their eyesight as a result of their service in Afghanistan or Iraq. We made a promise to these veterans. Cutting their COLA’s would be reneging on those promises and we cannot let that happen.

We have also made a commitment to the surviving spouses and children who have lost a loved one in battle by providing them with Dependency Indemnity Compensation benefits that average less than $17,000 a year.

Like many of my colleagues in the Senate, I have attended the funerals of brave soldiers killed in both Iraq and Afghanistan.

I remember telling their grieving spouses and young children that our country would never forget their sacrifice and loss. It would be absolutely immoral to cut the very modest benefits they receive by adopting a chained-CPI.
Further, we have made a promise to every American: Social Security will be there for you in your old age, or if you become disabled. And, those benefits will also keep up with inflation.

Today, over 9 million veterans receive Social Security benefits; and more than 770,000 veterans receive Social Security disability benefits. We’re talking about those who served in World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War and many others.

Under the chained CPI, average seniors who retire at age 65 would see their Social Security benefits cut by about $650 a year when they reach 75 and more than $1,000 a year once they turn 85.

We simply cannot renege on the promises we have made to our nation’s veterans by cutting the very modest benefits that they have earned. That’s exactly what the chained-CPI would do and that is exactly why it does not belong in deficit reduction.

And, let me be very clear: the American people strongly support the position we are advocating for today, including the AARP, the AFL-CIO, the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare and many other groups representing senior citizens, working families, and the disabled.

In poll after poll, including one that appeared just yesterday in the Washington Post the American people have been extremely clear: do not cut Social Security, do not cut Medicare, do not cut Medicaid benefits, and do not lower COLAs.


It’s time that Congress and the White House listened to the people who have put their lives on the line defending this country and to the American people.


Bernie Sanders, along with all the groups he mentioned in this speech, have been very publicly outspoken about the disaster the Chained CPI would be for Veterans, Widows, Dependent Children, Seniors and the the Disabled.

I trust all of these people to look out for the best interests of the American people.

You can find a lot more on the Chained CPI by Bernie Sanders and others. I am still waiting for someone to tell me why Sanders and all the other Dems and Unions are wrong about this.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It is the football that Lucy currently holds so Charlie Brown can try to kick it. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #1
I'm sorry, that doesn't make any sense to me at all. sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #2
Don't you see? MannyGoldstein Dec 2012 #4
Manny ... Is Obama going to cave and make a deal which cuts SS by the end of the year?" Yes / No. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #6
Do you consider the Chained CPI to be a cut to SS? sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #7
Since it results in lower benefits over time than what would otherwise occur mbperrin Dec 2012 #36
Thank you that is how I see it and that is how Veterans and all other Dem sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #62
Can hookers be convicted for simply offering to shtup? MannyGoldstein Dec 2012 #9
So you agree with regressive anti-prostitution laws? joshcryer Dec 2012 #12
Oh boy. MannyGoldstein Dec 2012 #15
Not going to answer the question? Anti-John laws have shown consistently... joshcryer Dec 2012 #18
Have I told you that I love you? MannyGoldstein Dec 2012 #21
For what it's worth... joshcryer Dec 2012 #26
And Happy Holidays to you Manny truedelphi Dec 2012 #51
Yes - the Social Security tax cut. Cuts the amount of money going into SS. grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #19
Manny ... Is Obama going to cave and make a deal which cuts SS by the end of the year?" Yes / No. pomkrazy Dec 2012 #93
Well, I'm trying to see and understand the claims that this is some brilliant sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #23
Face the facts, babe: MannyGoldstein Dec 2012 #25
Lol, this must be true because no matter how hard I try, I cannot figure it out, this sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #32
Where did I say that SS contributes to the deficit??? JoePhilly Dec 2012 #5
Yep, the poverty exemption assures it will not happen that way. joshcryer Dec 2012 #11
How does exempting the poorest from the Chained CPI lift them out of poverty? Sekhmets Daughter Dec 2012 #50
Their base income is increased to some value above 125% poverty. joshcryer Dec 2012 #55
Where did you read that? Sekhmets Daughter Dec 2012 #56
That's because Pelosi is taken out of context by liars. joshcryer Dec 2012 #63
I tend to trust Pelosi Sekhmets Daughter Dec 2012 #65
You tend to trust Nancy impeachment-is-off-the-table Pelosi? Good for you. AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2012 #67
Is that you Newt? Sekhmets Daughter Dec 2012 #75
War criminals should be in prison. They should not be walking around free, rich, and happy. AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2012 #85
So you would Sekhmets Daughter Dec 2012 #89
Nancy Pelosi said this week that the Chained CPI will 'strengthen SS' and that sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #71
Last year the Treasury had to borrow Sekhmets Daughter Dec 2012 #77
The SS Fund has more than one source of revenue. That is why despite the sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #91
I don't disagree... Sekhmets Daughter Dec 2012 #96
Well, I think we basically agree. The main point though is that while SS sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #100
I'll tell you what really worries me about Sekhmets Daughter Dec 2012 #101
Nancy Pelosi said this week that the Chained CPI will 'strengthen SS' and that pomkrazy Dec 2012 #94
So then Nancy Pelosi was wrong to say she will support Obama's inclusion of the sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #14
But Obama put them on the table - that's the problem grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #20
Those programs exist, the GOP hates them, therefore, they are always on the table. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #38
They hate the 14th amendment, why not put that on the table? Because it has nothing grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #79
Is Obama going to make a deal that cuts SS by the end of the year ... yes or no. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #105
No, but only because we've raised holy hell about about it. That said, grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #106
I think ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2012 #37
Well, that was not the question though. There are people here on DU who sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #53
Because ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2012 #66
Why should everyone else receive cuts? Luminous Animal Dec 2012 #70
Okay n/t 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2012 #73
What are these exemptions? Bernie Sanders and many other respected Dems sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #74
That's my point ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2012 #76
No, there is not any reason for a Fund that is independent of the Fed Budget sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #81
Okay n/t 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2012 #83
Nonsense. AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2012 #8
LOL limpyhobbler Dec 2012 #61
There is no reason for Social Security to be in a deficit discussion Melissa G Dec 2012 #16
Its more than a defict discussion. Always has been. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #40
And how does a discussion of the problems with the Fed Budget have anything to sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #58
Yes, and that doesn't matter. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #107
Your posts are not complete or logical. Melissa G Dec 2012 #78
I'm simply stating facts. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #108
You are NOT simply stating facts. Melissa G Dec 2012 #110
But that is not what was offered when SS was put on the table! it is cutting benefits! SugarShack Dec 2012 #27
So do you predict that Obama will agree to a deal that cuts SS by the end of this year? Yes or No. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #42
Respectfully, that's ludicrous. Demo_Chris Dec 2012 #52
If this ends up being part of a deal made with Republicans, Democrats sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #68
So is your prediction that he will make a deal to cut SS by the end of the year. Yes or No. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #109
+1 Liberalynn Dec 2012 #3
No more GRAND DEALS including the kitchen sink. _Liann_ Dec 2012 #10
+1 grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #22
Couldn't agree more, but if they did things the logical way as you laid out, sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #64
I fail to see the "brilliance" in the President ... ProfessionalLeftist Dec 2012 #13
+1 nashville_brook Dec 2012 #17
I agree, but I am being told here on DU that putting SS cuts on this table sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #24
because many here just can't believe Obama would do such a thing, but he HAS! SugarShack Dec 2012 #28
Respect? How do you know how people came to the decisions they have? If you can say that patrice Dec 2012 #30
Thank you. 840high Dec 2012 #45
So is your prediction that he will make a deal to cut SS by the end of the year. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #43
It speaks to Repubs' 47%. Getting MORE people to stand up to their "representation" is good, that is patrice Dec 2012 #29
Well, we're not talking about 'demogogues on the internet' we are talking about sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #31
The only thing from Sanders about the CPI that I have seen was a chart showing the slowing in the patrice Dec 2012 #34
Bernie Sanders on the Chained CPI: sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #39
Thanks, Senator Sanders is good enough for me. nt patrice Dec 2012 #69
What I find amazing... former_con Dec 2012 #33
Why? in a word, Congress. And what calls itself "the Left" is getting all of the mileage it can out patrice Dec 2012 #35
Yep former_con Dec 2012 #41
I gather you are not impressed with "the Left". madfloridian Dec 2012 #47
What do you mean by 'the left'? Maybe I am misuderstanding you but you seem sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #59
I took it to mean the poster is former_con Dec 2012 #92
Why, indeed? CrispyQ Dec 2012 #90
good luck stupidicus Dec 2012 #44
Good post. sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #97
that's it in a nutshell alrighty stupidicus Dec 2012 #104
Doggone it, Sabrina. There you go playing checkers again. madfloridian Dec 2012 #46
Omg, did Plouffe really say that? I can't believe it! Who are these people who sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #72
Between six and seven sulphurdunn Dec 2012 #48
Exactly, that is what we should be discussing. But even here on DU I see sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #82
Right now I am focused upon what is happening in Newtown bluestateguy Dec 2012 #49
We can do both. It won't help Veterans, Seniors and the most vulnerable sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #54
I thought he was just going to wash Boehner's car leftstreet Dec 2012 #57
Maybe Obama secretly wants to cut social security. limpyhobbler Dec 2012 #60
DING DING DING! We have a winner! grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #80
+1 forestpath Dec 2012 #88
Maybe Obama secretly wants to cut social security. pomkrazy Dec 2012 #98
There is nothing brilliant about.... NCTraveler Dec 2012 #84
I'm waiting for the entire democratic party to say what Representative Brown said: CrispyQ Dec 2012 #86
It's a huge betrayal and kick in the teeth to vulnerable people. forestpath Dec 2012 #87
this n/t ^^^^^ warrprayer Dec 2012 #95
You go with what you got. If that's all you have, you use it. Autumn Dec 2012 #99
Its a sleight of hand. HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #102
Thanks, that is correct. It is the attempt to deceive that has angered so many sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #103
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The offer of the Chained ...»Reply #39