Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Emile

(41,540 posts)
177. You prove it and send me a link. I looked many times!
Fri Oct 31, 2025, 01:58 PM
Oct 2025

This is what I find:

Merrick Garland's political party affiliation is not publicly stated, and he is not known to be a registered Democrat or Republican. He is widely considered a moderate and judicial centrist, and his career as a judge has been marked by a reputation for being meticulous and for building consensus. He was appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit by President Bill Clinton and later appointed by President Joe Biden to serve as the United States Attorney General.

You said that I prefer a bad faith narrative over fact checking, I will accept your apology.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Has any one checked Garland's bank account during that time period? Irish_Dem Oct 2025 #1
you seriously think he was getting paid off for that? LymphocyteLover Oct 2025 #7
I seriously think some questions should be asked. Irish_Dem Oct 2025 #9
putting responsibility for the downfall of the country all on Garland is total bullshit LymphocyteLover Oct 2025 #16
Garland was in charge Chicagogrl1 Oct 2025 #17
I am trained as a scientist. You follow the data. Period. Irish_Dem Oct 2025 #20
bribery is possible (ie garland) rampartd Oct 2025 #21
who bribed him to do this? bigtree Oct 2025 #84
Thanks for the facts that too many would Hassler Oct 2025 #142
Thank you. Attackers got no defense. No facts. No sources. Just scapegoating and bitching. ancianita Oct 2025 #155
Bribery... or blackmail... or threats... Shipwack Oct 2025 #96
Completeness?? Puh-lease. For imagination's sake. Bad faith imaginings. ancianita Oct 2025 #160
Garland's problem is one that has hurt our party for too long... Trueblue Texan Oct 2025 #42
We have been playing by The Marquess of Queensberry Rules 70sEraVet Oct 2025 #49
The right wing radicals have been playing by the rules of the abuser and the rapist Stacey Grove Oct 2025 #54
Gaslighting is a technique of the abuser. yellow dahlia Oct 2025 #150
I'm not sure the problems is PatSeg Oct 2025 #108
Perhaps, But When You Know You Are Dealing With... ProfessorGAC Oct 2025 #136
This is true PatSeg Oct 2025 #146
Seems We're Very Close To The Same Page ProfessorGAC Oct 2025 #167
Yes, I think so PatSeg Oct 2025 #171
Not the main one. The judiciary hurt the country. AG Garland was the solution, not part of the problem. ancianita Oct 2025 #163
Saying Garland was bribed SCantiGOP Oct 2025 #97
Saying he was bribed or people defending him? FHRRK Oct 2025 #99
What about MTG turning over a new leaf? MorbidButterflyTat Oct 2025 #129
"It all depends on who's ox is being gored." vanlassie Oct 2025 #159
I'm trained as a scientist and follow the data too. But I must be following different data. LymphocyteLover Oct 2025 #111
At the very least, he could have appointed Jack Smith a lot sooner Bluepinky Oct 2025 #120
More than two possibilities. PufPuf23 Oct 2025 #137
He is the entire reason Mr.WeRP Oct 2025 #117
bullshit LymphocyteLover Oct 2025 #169
Respectfully disagree Joinfortmill Oct 2025 #32
Garland stepped on his dick the whole time the greatest crime in US history was being planned. Irish_Dem Oct 2025 #34
Respectfully disagree. Joinfortmill Oct 2025 #36
Respectfully Agree. nt yaesu Oct 2025 #53
I respectfully agree! Emile Oct 2025 #56
Is "stepped on his dick" typical language MorbidButterflyTat Oct 2025 #130
Varies between sciences, mr715 Oct 2025 #144
So he alone caused the downfall of this country? sheshe2 Oct 2025 #154
We would be totally remiss if we did not ask questions. Irish_Dem Oct 2025 #13
One question; Why did President Biden stand by him for 4 years? MichMan Oct 2025 #29
Until recently Presidents didn't interfere with ongoing investigations Joinfortmill Oct 2025 #33
Because he is an institutionalist with "faith" in a broken system; Stacey Grove Oct 2025 #51
I agree Scubamatt Oct 2025 #81
Biden's presidency was immersed within an actual coup started on Jan 6 Stacey Grove Oct 2025 #92
Democratic leadership & the dems in general, CrispyQ Oct 2025 #98
Agree Hey Joe Oct 2025 #70
I totally disagree that his actions made sense. CrispyQ Oct 2025 #86
Nah, he clearly wasn't right for the job. 2021 wasn't the time for a timid "if we do something it's political" bs themaguffin Oct 2025 #14
brazil's response to boisonero is the only way to deal with these guys rampartd Oct 2025 #23
absolutely themaguffin Oct 2025 #114
This isn't a Law & Order episode. You're such a defeatist. Patience, grasshopper. Garland's got this. Scrivener7 Oct 2025 #2
OMG Skittles Oct 2025 #4
Oh, some still insist they were right all along, and Garland was actually totally speedy and effective. Scrivener7 Oct 2025 #5
Exactly. NewHendoLib Oct 2025 #12
Media still timidly, and with an abundance of caution, calls Fascists "authoritarians" goddammit. RVN VET71 Oct 2025 #31
The media should be hysterical with the nazi fascist language. Like they were with Biden's terrible debate. Clouds Passing Oct 2025 #60
It is apparently "very concerning" to the media when an old Liberal shows his age RVN VET71 Oct 2025 #107
They formed the Garland Society. BannonsLiver Oct 2025 #64
The endless patience lectures was a major red flag. Irish_Dem Oct 2025 #15
Might it have been kompromat? yellow dahlia Oct 2025 #151
You made me snicker. Solly Mack Oct 2025 #18
Sure and hell heard that a lot, just wait we got him. republianmushroom Oct 2025 #80
To me, the biggest clue was when Schiff spoke out so forcefully early spooky3 Oct 2025 #102
to be fair Skittles Oct 2025 #3
And, once again, FUCK YOU MITCH MCCONNELL! Chasstev365 Oct 2025 #6
Yep. Garland should be sitting on SCOTUS! CaptainTruth Oct 2025 #28
This cannot be said enough! True Dough Oct 2025 #40
'Acting on a mix of principle and caution' Joinfortmill Oct 2025 #8
And now Trump is demanding indictments, claiming Garland weaponized the Justice Dept Martin Eden Oct 2025 #46
Of course. We all saw this - we all knew this Weak Sauce Merrick. NewHendoLib Oct 2025 #10
IMHO, being cautious in prosecuting a former POTUS, no matter how guilty they seem, is LymphocyteLover Oct 2025 #11
Downvote Ponietz Oct 2025 #19
It isn't reasonable when the former POTUS engineered an attempted violent coup to overthrow an election. Crunchy Frog Oct 2025 #67
Garland is a republican. Blue Full Moon Oct 2025 #22
Or a centrist independent like Cuomo. Emile Oct 2025 #57
Back in Texas a half century ago markodochartaigh Oct 2025 #125
Wrong. Merrick Garland, born in Chicago, was a Democrat when he was a private citizen in Chicago. ancianita Oct 2025 #148
Prove it. ancianita Oct 2025 #149
That's the problem, he keeps his political leaning private. Emile Oct 2025 #172
YOUR problem. You could look it up like I did and find out. You ancianita Oct 2025 #173
You prove it and send me a link. I looked many times! Emile Oct 2025 #177
There is plenty of fault to go around democrank Oct 2025 #24
Did you see the press conference where Garland calls out Bondi's DOJ for their illegal relationship w the White house? Intractable Oct 2025 #25
Why should he? MorbidButterflyTat Oct 2025 #131
I agree that Garland should only do what his heart is into. Intractable Oct 2025 #133
--and somebody needs a whole book to point this out? 3Hotdogs Oct 2025 #26
A lot of DUers here were bashed for the crime of criticizing Merrick Garland. gab13by13 Oct 2025 #30
Lest we forget, Eric Holder was also about as useless as my left nut -- no attempt to even investigate 3Hotdogs Oct 2025 #119
Some still, apparently, do. Scrivener7 Oct 2025 #88
I'm not a scientist, but I had math in grade school, gab13by13 Oct 2025 #27
The same thing Obama did, I imagine. Joinfortmill Oct 2025 #35
Good point, gab13by13 Oct 2025 #41
Garland was one of Obama's poorer choices. comradebillyboy Oct 2025 #59
Not certain Obama would agree with your assessment. As far as I can tell Obama has not spoken on the matter. Joinfortmill Oct 2025 #62
Which says it all, really. BannonsLiver Oct 2025 #72
Ha! Ok. Joinfortmill Oct 2025 #75
I don't need Obama's approval to have an opinion. comradebillyboy Oct 2025 #104
Ok. Joinfortmill Oct 2025 #106
To me RoeVWade Oct 2025 #48
Also, didn't Joe have one or two pages. Krasnov had a boat load of boxes. Sorting that out must have been time consuming Joinfortmill Oct 2025 #63
I don't expect any President who is multitasking all day, to be the one primarily in charge of where he set down the RoeVWade Oct 2025 #124
I believe the only reason Garland got BlueKota Oct 2025 #37
Impossible Orrex Oct 2025 #38
Amen. republianmushroom Oct 2025 #87
Cue the Garland apologists choie Oct 2025 #39
there are no Garland apologists bigtree Oct 2025 #69
.... BannonsLiver Oct 2025 #77
Found one! Orrex Oct 2025 #85
This article provides the evidence you pretend iemanja Oct 2025 #153
Res ipse loquitur. choie Oct 2025 #161
Res ipsa loquitur bigtree Oct 2025 #162
This message was self-deleted by its author BannonsLiver Oct 2025 #74
With the requisite wall o' words. Scrivener7 Oct 2025 #89
I think wall of facts is more accurate. Joinfortmill Oct 2025 #105
Yes. I imagine you do. Scrivener7 Oct 2025 #109
I do Joinfortmill Oct 2025 #118
It's obvious the haters are disrespectful MorbidButterflyTat Oct 2025 #132
Words that are proportional to the election interference & massive coup attempt catastrophe by thousands. ancianita Oct 2025 #165
And we could have had: AverageOldGuy Oct 2025 #43
Bet your bottom dollar he blew it. His inaction will never be overcome. Autumn Oct 2025 #44
Garland sandbagged it azureblue Oct 2025 #45
I have to admit to getting a twinge of something resembling PTSD when I read this title..... Ol Janx Spirit Oct 2025 #47
Joe Biden was one of the greats. Joinfortmill Oct 2025 #90
Garland was operating under a long outdated set of rules. Patton French Oct 2025 #50
Biden nominated the wrong guy. enough Oct 2025 #52
Which was a big mistake. BannonsLiver Oct 2025 #91
Those with money/resources/a voice who have or had connections to power Stacey Grove Oct 2025 #55
Maybe we should at least put part of the blame on THIS supreme court? bluestarone Oct 2025 #58
Much of the Biden administration was apparently very risk-averse. Borogove Oct 2025 #61
And we are all now paying the penalty Stacey Grove Oct 2025 #65
There has been so many kacekwl Oct 2025 #66
this is old and revisionist. Besides, Dilanian is a hack. bigtree Oct 2025 #68
There's no amount of cut and paste that's going to salvage his legacy. BannonsLiver Oct 2025 #79
That's the cheerleaders' Gish gallop Orrex Oct 2025 #93
I'll never understand the fevered devotion. It's utterly bizarre. BannonsLiver Oct 2025 #94
There are many, many words here. All the words. Scrivener7 Oct 2025 #100
Big men with tears in their eyes said, "Sir, even the best words." Stacey Grove Oct 2025 #116
Thank you for this. Very informative... Joinfortmill Oct 2025 #103
"Blew it" would imply a good faith effort Queso Delicioso Oct 2025 #71
he could have stopped the investigation at any point bigtree Oct 2025 #82
You forgot the last step Queso Delicioso Oct 2025 #139
This will go down in history as the biggest mistake a Democratic President ever made in appointing a cabinet member. lees1975 Oct 2025 #73
I agree. yellow dahlia Oct 2025 #156
I wonder how he feels about the DOJ now. Grumpy Old Guy Oct 2025 #76
I don't know what Democrats didn't understand about insurrection bucolic_frolic Oct 2025 #78
Agreed. yellow dahlia Oct 2025 #157
They were scared of the orange convicts shadow. And many are still today. Hotler Oct 2025 #83
where were they supposed to be 'scared" of? bigtree Oct 2025 #95
Look- a game of "I told you so." Redleg Oct 2025 #101
When they found the truck load of secret, classified documents in his bathroom questionseverything Oct 2025 #122
You are probably correct. Redleg Oct 2025 #123
Seriously! yellow dahlia Oct 2025 #158
I'm Not a Garland Fan, But Other Than This Particular Appalling Slow-walk I Think His Record Is Pretty Unimpeachable The Roux Comes First Oct 2025 #110
"But other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, what did you think of the show?" Scrivener7 Oct 2025 #179
Touche! The Roux Comes First Nov 2025 #180
Democrats had historic, multi-felony charges against their political opponent bigtree Oct 2025 #112
Without Garland we never would have Jack Smith. nt in2herbs Oct 2025 #113
Didn't Mueller popsdenver Oct 2025 #138
Garland as AG is the only person with authority to appoint a special counsel. nt in2herbs Oct 2025 #145
One possible fault. moondust Oct 2025 #115
"Justice Delayed is Justice Denied" SleeplessinSoCal Oct 2025 #121
Without coming down on the pro or anti markodochartaigh Oct 2025 #126
The headline misspelled B-I-D-E-N. RockRaven Oct 2025 #127
So, what time does Thursday Night Football start? MorbidButterflyTat Oct 2025 #128
About as insightful as your other comments. Intractable Oct 2025 #134
What position of power does Garland hold now? MineralMan Oct 2025 #135
"Those who cannot remember the past, are condemned to repeat it." - George Santayana, The Life of Reason (1905) Celerity Oct 2025 #147
"Those who dwell on the past in despair make no progress" - MineralMan, Democratic Underground, 2025 MineralMan Oct 2025 #170
Indeed, a wise saying, that those who dwell on the past in despair make no progress... SWBTATTReg Oct 2025 #174
He bears partial blame for Trump's being President now iemanja Oct 2025 #164
So much for "justice is blind" Layzeebeaver Oct 2025 #140
I just had to close my door, I was ranting about this so loudly BigmanPigman Oct 2025 #141
Wrong choice! seta1950 Oct 2025 #143
We all knew that in 2021 . Garland and Smith were too cautious.... Bread and Circuses Oct 2025 #152
How much investigating was needed for the classified documents Sewa Nov 2025 #182
Yup.nt jfz9580m Oct 2025 #166
"justice delayed is justice denied" spanone Oct 2025 #168
tell it to the judge bigtree Oct 2025 #175
That's it! Emile Oct 2025 #178
"Acting on a mix of principle and caution ..." TOTAL BULLSHIT Bluetus Oct 2025 #176
The biggest national security blunder of my lifetime ecstatic Nov 2025 #181
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sure looks like Garland b...»Reply #177