Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pat_k

(12,658 posts)
2. Tragically, we are already paying for DOJ defense of the regime's criminal acts. However,
Fri Oct 31, 2025, 10:16 PM
Oct 31

...the people are winning. And when the regime is gone, there will be solid cases against minions in the administration.

More than 100 judges have ruled against the Trump admin’s mandatory detention policy
A POLITICO review of the rulings shows judges appointed by every president since Ronald Reagan have rebuked the administration’s new interpretation of immigration law.
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/31/trump-administration-mandatory-detention-deportation-00632086

It’s one of the most thorough legal rebukes in recent memory.

More than 100 federal judges have now ruled at least 200 times that the Trump administration’s effort to systematically detain immigrants facing possible deportation appeared to violate their rights or was just flatly illegal, according to a POLITICO review


When this regime is gone, prosecutions against Trump will undoubtedly be pursued on the grounds that corruption in the form of self-dealing and acts that violate the constitution cannot be considered "official acts" for which he has immunity. Some of these may, or may not, get far.

But other people in the administration only have qualified immunity, which protects them from civil liability unless they violate "clearly established" statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.

I think there are a host of people who we will be able to hold personally liable for acts that blatantly violate constitutional rights -- particularly in light of the fact that they continue to commit the actions after courts have deemed them illegal.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who will pay for ICE's da...»Reply #2