Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pat_k

(13,839 posts)
18. I think the orders on SNAP are unique. Circumstances aren't like the typical "wait to see what happens on appeal."
Sun Nov 2, 2025, 06:39 PM
Nov 2025

They said "We'd like to pay snap benefits, but it wouldn't be legal." It's the Democrats fault that we are not paying.

Now they've been given the go ahead to pay.

So, either they appeal and expose the magnitude of the lie: "We'd like to pay, but our hands are tied," or they pay, and take a "mea culpa" on the lie that it wouldn't be legal.

I don't think there is another lawsuit in which they are being sued to do a thing they claim they want to do but can't. Their position on the other illegal and unconstitutional things they are being sued for is: "We must do X because Y, and we have the power to do X."

I think their hand has been forced. And they should have realized it would play out this way. They knew they had both the legal authority and legal obligation to pay. Did they really think the Democrats would just cave in the face of such a blatantly immoral and unlawful act?

Perhaps they are cruel and stupid enough to appeal, and thereby prove how hellbent they are to starve people, but I think they realize they seriously fucked up and have been exposed. Their best bet is to quickly pay and then bomb Venezuela to grab headlines before their lies and cruelty -- unnecessarily terrorizing SNAP recipients, and then falsely attempting to blame democrats for the harm -- sink in with the public.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Article below. Duncanpup Nov 2025 #1
'Forced" how? DOES sound good, elleng Nov 2025 #2
I thought "forced" was simpler than "won an injunction" pat_k Nov 2025 #4
How much power they have after Trump v CASA is something that will need to play out Amishman Nov 2025 #9
I think the orders on SNAP are unique. Circumstances aren't like the typical "wait to see what happens on appeal." pat_k Nov 2025 #18
Deleted misplaced reply pat_k Nov 2025 #3
And don't forget... marcopolo63 Nov 2025 #5
Of course -- first thing Mikey J must do when he goes back into session is swear in Adelita Grijalva... and from there.. pat_k Nov 2025 #6
THAT choie Nov 2025 #7
Got the notice yesterday that my insurance rates are doubling next year. Efilroft Sul Nov 2025 #8
I was lucky enough to escape. I turned 65 in Sept so start Medicare, but would be looking at the same thing. pat_k Nov 2025 #10
Hear! Hear! yellow dahlia Nov 2025 #11
Democrats WON in the courts, which are toothless, and so far it appears that Trump is poised to Jack Valentino Nov 2025 #12
Then he risks going to jail. valleyrogue Nov 2025 #13
You forget, the SC already ruled that the President is immune to any criminal prosecution Jack Valentino Nov 2025 #14
Trump said he'll pay "with appropriate court guidance" (or some shit) pat_k Nov 2025 #15
As of today BeerBarrelPolka Nov 2025 #16
Fingers crossed that payments are just delayed due to their illegal refusal to use contingency funds. pat_k Nov 2025 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democrats forced Trump to...»Reply #18