Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

tex-wyo-dem

(3,190 posts)
Thu Dec 27, 2012, 02:17 AM Dec 2012

Flintlock muskets... [View all]

Fucking flintlock muskets. That's basically the only type of firearm a person could acquire when the 2nd amendment was written.

Ruminate on that for a moment.

A gun that fires a single round, that requires no less than a minute to reload another SINGLE round. With ammunition that consists of a heavy ball that most likely stops in the first body it hits.

I've fired a flintlock before...the recoil damn near knocks you on your ass and you can't even see the target you've just fired at through all the smoke. Reloading takes forever and a great amount of skill...I'm glad I never had to reload one of those things in a war.

The authors of the Constitution had no idea of the technology of the future, and I can bet they never envisioned the "right" for anyone to acquire guns that can fire several rounds in a few seconds, with a single bullet being able to cut through several bodies before stopping.

That's why the founding fathers made the Constitution a living document...they knew it would have to change with the times.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Flintlock muskets... [View all] tex-wyo-dem Dec 2012 OP
The founding fathers wanted people to have weapons available to soldiers at the time Hugabear Dec 2012 #1
And the same with information technology, the internet on lead type ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #2
Exactly! nt tex-wyo-dem Dec 2012 #3
Do you actually know the point you are trying to make? intaglio Dec 2012 #8
"The rights to life and liberty are in the Constitution" needledriver Dec 2012 #17
Sorry, Declaration my error n/t intaglio Dec 2012 #21
The Girandoni Air Rifle predated the second amendment Brother Buzz Dec 2012 #4
So what was the general availability of the... tex-wyo-dem Dec 2012 #5
I guess my attempt at jocularity failed miserably Brother Buzz Dec 2012 #9
oh jeez... tex-wyo-dem Dec 2012 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author Brother Buzz Dec 2012 #7
... and required 1,500 pumps to fill the reservoir intaglio Dec 2012 #10
Read DC v Heller and all the submitted briefs and you will begin to understand. nt jody Dec 2012 #6
Once again, we only had a militia because we didn't have a standing army and as a new nation, world wide wally Dec 2012 #11
You have it backwards missionkam Dec 2012 #12
In that case, here is what we got. safeinOhio Dec 2012 #15
One common battle tactic was to have... TreasonousBastard Dec 2012 #13
A Ferguson breech-loading musket was one of the more advanced assault weapons of the period Historic NY Dec 2012 #14
Cannons. You could own them then and you can own them now. OneTenthofOnePercent Dec 2012 #16
Actually, British front line troops could load and fire a musket 3 to 4 times in a minute LibertyLover Dec 2012 #18
Besides understanding the wisdom in reucing the need for a large standing army, the FF also knew jmg257 Dec 2012 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Flintlock muskets...