Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Flintlock muskets... [View all]

LibertyLover

(4,788 posts)
18. Actually, British front line troops could load and fire a musket 3 to 4 times in a minute
Thu Dec 27, 2012, 11:00 AM
Dec 2012

- granted they couldn't keep that rate of fire up for very long, but they didn't need to because after several volleys, you went after the enemy with your bayonet. Poorer trained troops could still fire twice a minute. I've fired both a Brown Bess type musket and a rifled musket and while the recoil was there it wasn't that bad. It certainly didn't knock me on my ass.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Flintlock muskets... [View all] tex-wyo-dem Dec 2012 OP
The founding fathers wanted people to have weapons available to soldiers at the time Hugabear Dec 2012 #1
And the same with information technology, the internet on lead type ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #2
Exactly! nt tex-wyo-dem Dec 2012 #3
Do you actually know the point you are trying to make? intaglio Dec 2012 #8
"The rights to life and liberty are in the Constitution" needledriver Dec 2012 #17
Sorry, Declaration my error n/t intaglio Dec 2012 #21
The Girandoni Air Rifle predated the second amendment Brother Buzz Dec 2012 #4
So what was the general availability of the... tex-wyo-dem Dec 2012 #5
I guess my attempt at jocularity failed miserably Brother Buzz Dec 2012 #9
oh jeez... tex-wyo-dem Dec 2012 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author Brother Buzz Dec 2012 #7
... and required 1,500 pumps to fill the reservoir intaglio Dec 2012 #10
Read DC v Heller and all the submitted briefs and you will begin to understand. nt jody Dec 2012 #6
Once again, we only had a militia because we didn't have a standing army and as a new nation, world wide wally Dec 2012 #11
You have it backwards missionkam Dec 2012 #12
In that case, here is what we got. safeinOhio Dec 2012 #15
One common battle tactic was to have... TreasonousBastard Dec 2012 #13
A Ferguson breech-loading musket was one of the more advanced assault weapons of the period Historic NY Dec 2012 #14
Cannons. You could own them then and you can own them now. OneTenthofOnePercent Dec 2012 #16
Actually, British front line troops could load and fire a musket 3 to 4 times in a minute LibertyLover Dec 2012 #18
Besides understanding the wisdom in reucing the need for a large standing army, the FF also knew jmg257 Dec 2012 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Flintlock muskets...»Reply #18