Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hamsterjill

(16,877 posts)
10. Because it generally means that the borrower can't afford the loan.
Tue Nov 11, 2025, 02:16 PM
Nov 11

Sad, but true. I worked in real estate for many decades. People who barely qualify for a loan typically have a hard time making the payments and many wind up in foreclosure. I've seen homebuilders who have programs that get people qualified one way or another. Lots of back slapping and promises of everything.

Then the borrower gets behind on payments, and the mortgage company (which is usually an affiliate of the builder) swoops in and forecloses. Most people aren't able to sell a "used" home in a subdivision where a builder is still active because why buy a "used" home when you can get a new one with a warranty and better financing terms? Plus, many borrowers face foreclosure before enough time elapses for them to have gained any equity on the home, and the mortgage may be more than the value of the home.

The borrower has lost their down payment and whatever they've paid prior to the foreclosure, and the home goes on the market again. Typically an investor buys a block of them.

Lather. Rinse. Repeat.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Here we go again... Ocelot II Nov 11 #1
I already saw the ending to this movie. Irish_Dem Nov 11 #26
Add in 50 year mortgages, and what could go wrong? Nt Fiendish Thingy Nov 11 #2
On top of the risk this implies (as you suggest) due to parallels to the 2008 catastrophe AZJonnie Nov 11 #3
We're in real trouble when they start handing out second mortgages. Johonny Nov 11 #4
Great. Another Dem POTUS will bail out banks leftstreet Nov 11 #5
Surprising we're against people with low credit scores getting considered for a mortgage. Silent Type Nov 11 #6
I had a low credit score for years and was unable to buy a home. A HERETIC I AM Nov 11 #7
"I stopped doing the things that got me the low credit score to begin with." Maru Kitteh Nov 11 #18
That's how our credit rating died, in mountains of medical debt. hunter Nov 11 #29
Um, folks about to lose their medical insurance! MerryBlooms Nov 11 #20
Unfortunately, we all pay when these mortgages go into default Totally Tunsie Nov 11 #8
To a libertarian, there's no such thing as a negative externality Prairie Gates Nov 11 #13
Because it generally means that the borrower can't afford the loan. hamsterjill Nov 11 #10
I recall one of the most infamous tricks of the time: Totally Tunsie Nov 11 #15
Surprised you're against protecting them from lenders leftstreet Nov 11 #11
The only sacred principle is that all borrowers should have the choice to be exploited Prairie Gates Nov 11 #14
All DUrs are against low credit score holders being exploited uponit7771 Nov 11 #16
If you consider someone finally getting a house exploitation. I don't. Silent Type Nov 11 #17
Someone who can't afford it getting one? Yes ! You know that already and are talking around obvious concerns... uponit7771 Nov 11 #19
620 doesn't mean you can't afford it. You deserve an evaluation. This doesn't guarantee a loan, just consideration. Silent Type Nov 11 #21
Known known, credit worthiness doesn't express affordability, don't see the point in expressing the obvious? Bottom line uponit7771 Nov 11 #23
Trump is proposing to fix serious problems with bandaids. snot Nov 11 #31
No question it's bandaids. So was $50K for a down payment. Silent Type Nov 11 #32
This is why Grants and Grant City went out of business. QueerDuck Nov 11 #9
When these people, go bankrupt or get behind in payment all these corporate companies will snap up the housing kimbutgar Nov 11 #12
That doesn't Rebl2 Nov 11 #22
Thin credit files shouldn't disqualify otherwise qualified borrowers. flvegan Nov 11 #24
Right, no credit can be worse than bad but their earning history kicks in for housing usually. I'm not trusting these .. uponit7771 Nov 11 #25
The fear that they'll qualify borrowers they shouldn't flvegan Nov 11 #27
I Felt Very Sorry For People Last Time Around OC375 Nov 11 #28
I have seen so many young people buy more redstatebluegirl Nov 11 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fannie Mae to Drop Minimu...»Reply #10