Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama Is on the Brink of a Settlement With the Big Banks—and Progressives Are Furious [View all]PA Democrat
(13,428 posts)25. Thanks for posting.
This story was posted from a different source earlier today, and the thread devolved into a bash-the-messenger character assassination.
I posted this in the other thread, but I'll add it here for people who may not have seen it. Senator Sherrod Brown issued a press release about the proposed settlement last week. Here is an excerpt with more at the link below.
A settlement must also impose adequate penalties on servicers who broke the law. There are reports that the settlement could permit servicers to receive credit for writing down the value of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) owned by investors, without requiring servicers to reduce principal on the mortgages and second liens that they own. Ohios public employee pension funds have significant investments in MBS, and therefore have significant interest in the terms of the settlement. The reported settlement terms would allow banks to write down the investments of many of my constituents, without sacrificing anything. And, depending upon the scope, any settlement could potentially preclude these funds from pursuing actions to recoup more than $457 million in losses, allegedly due to credit ratings agencies improperly rating MBS. Such terms are unacceptable.
Teachers, first responders, law enforcement, and other pensioners and retirees should not be penalized for wrongdoing by Wall Street. An adequate loss-sharing arrangement would acknowledge the reality that there is no penalty for servicers writing down the value of assets that belong to someone else. There is also no penalty associated with servicers writing down a portion of their assets in this case, their second lien holdings that actually have no value. It is often in investors best interest to reduce mortgage principal, but this settlement must penalize the servicers who broke the law.
Teachers, first responders, law enforcement, and other pensioners and retirees should not be penalized for wrongdoing by Wall Street. An adequate loss-sharing arrangement would acknowledge the reality that there is no penalty for servicers writing down the value of assets that belong to someone else. There is also no penalty associated with servicers writing down a portion of their assets in this case, their second lien holdings that actually have no value. It is often in investors best interest to reduce mortgage principal, but this settlement must penalize the servicers who broke the law.
http://brown.senate.gov/newsroom/press_releases/release/?id=d318a589-e27c-4b33-93c8-83d26e2b61ae
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
145 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obama Is on the Brink of a Settlement With the Big Banks—and Progressives Are Furious [View all]
XemaSab
Jan 2012
OP
so the 'deal' hasn't been announced yet and 'progressives are furious' how's that happen?
spanone
Jan 2012
#4
So your next comment gets hidden just for simply quoting the poster above?
LiberalLovinLug
Jan 2012
#126
It's a preemptive hissy not unlike FDL announcing that at the 2011 SOTU address
AtomicKitten
Jan 2012
#18
i'm saying i don't know what the hell the deal is. neither do YOU or anyone else.
spanone
Jan 2012
#24
Let's assume Sherrod Brown as well as the journalists reporting this story..
girl gone mad
Jan 2012
#28
He will not respond whether or not he supports the deal until after the president makes a decision.
rhett o rick
Jan 2012
#32
It wasnt intended to be funny. I suspect your laughter is hysteria setting in.
rhett o rick
Jan 2012
#56
I know what I want, and I am curious what you want. This has come up many times before.
rhett o rick
Jan 2012
#31
Wait one minute. I might be drunk. I do some of my best....ah, best.... Anyway
rhett o rick
Jan 2012
#53
Watch them structure this so that the banks get to claim loss deductions for tax purposes.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2012
#5
Which would allow them to deduct a de facto criminal conduct fine against their taxes...
LooseWilly
Jan 2012
#95
If you do it the right way, you'll even have enough money left over for campaign contributions.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2012
#135
Paul Soglin is an amazing person. It's good to see that he is on the job and still appreciated.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2012
#140
The sellouts to, and protection of the banksters, have attained a certain *shrug* factor.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jan 2012
#16
I've always found PPI to be an oxymoron considering their business first Republicanesque policies
Dragonfli
Jan 2012
#73
What GOP line? The GOP wants the banks punished? I do, do you? If you dont, maybe you
rhett o rick
Jan 2012
#55
The AGs were being pressured NOT to prosecute the Banks. That failed when their
sabrina 1
Jan 2012
#66
He's got it made. Who else will the majority vote for? Gingrich? Rmoney?
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2012
#108
Most of the Progressives are gone..but another "K&R" in case more are lurking." n/t
KoKo
Jan 2012
#61
thanks for posting. dont understand how anyone can watch this and still support anyone in office
xiamiam
Jan 2012
#116
What on earth would make a person think a credit rating agency, appraisal agency...
boppers
Jan 2012
#90
It is easy to be objective and make the comments you are making now that the
truedelphi
Jan 2012
#94
Boppers, what party or organization should a homeowner trust for an appraisal or determination of
ms.smiler
Jan 2012
#97
Yes, homes can lose value. Many factors actually play a role in the value of a home.
ms.smiler
Jan 2012
#103
The headline's use of "progressives" minimizes what would be an outrage to everyone.
JackRiddler
Jan 2012
#82
Alternatively, top-down change is not feasible and instead WE ARE THE ONES WE'VE BEEN WAITING FOR.
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2012
#122
Just noticed your posting after I posted this and a few other articles on the subject.
Better Believe It
Jan 2012
#111
I Just noticed your posting after I posted this and a few other articles on the subject.
Better Believe It
Jan 2012
#112
But.. but.. there are many - even here on DU - who claim Obama is perfect and can do no wrong
slay
Jan 2012
#117
But there have been successful civil cases. In fact if it were not for those cases
sabrina 1
Jan 2012
#128
I'm trying to decide how I feel about this in the reverse, i.e., what do I want the outcome to be.
stevenleser
Jan 2012
#134