General Discussion

AZJonnie

(3,724 posts)

7. Well, that's very convenient since Giuffre REPEATEDLY exonerated Trump of any wrongdoing including in her book

Wed Nov 12, 2025, 08:05 PM

Nov 2025

However, this email is from 2011. Virginia Guiffre left Epstein's orbit in ... checks notes ... 2002.

So, Trump wants us to believe that NINE YEARS later, Epstein is just randomly bringing up the time when Guiffre met Trump? His victim who said "he couldn't have been nicer" about Donald Trump?

WHY? That makes absolutely zero sense.

However, it WOULD make a lot of sense to NOT want to say "that was actually a COP", would it not?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

JBTaurus83 FakeNoose

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sorry to annoy everyone yet again, but much about that Epstein email hangs on the accuracy of one word [View all] AZJonnie Nov 2025 OP

you seem very vested in all of this Skittles Nov 2025 #1

to be honest every day I see dozens here incredibly vested in this. WarGamer Nov 2025 #3

I have two answers for you AZJonnie Nov 2025 #4

Is that email in question from the estate? OneGrassRoot Nov 2025 #6

I cannot possibly imagine that the DoJ does/did not have everything the Estate has in this regard, long ago AZJonnie Nov 2025 #8

Well, not just Biden's DOJ. Sorry to burst the bubble you'd prefer to exist in, but it is true. RockRaven Nov 2025 #10

I see you as rather a brilliant person so this reply surprises me. AZJonnie Nov 2025 #11

I believe my last post failed to communicate to you what I intended. RockRaven Nov 2025 #18

Thanks for clarification. This is exactly the sort of cogent argument I always see from RockRaven AZJonnie Nov 2025 #33

I don't think BeerBarrelPolka Nov 2025 #34

yeah OK Skittles Nov 2025 #12

Because Biden wanted to protect others. Sadly. Bluesaph Nov 2025 #32

I am one KentuckyWoman Nov 2025 #19

The White House released the name Abnredleg Nov 2025 #2

Well, that's very convenient since Giuffre REPEATEDLY exonerated Trump of any wrongdoing including in her book AZJonnie Nov 2025 #7

do you admit that Trump is one vile, disgusting POS??? Skittles Nov 2025 #13

Do you not see what I post, all day and every day? I mean obviously not everything, but generally? AZJonnie Nov 2025 #15

The premise of this post is wrong, from what I've read. The ID is known, from multiple RockRaven Nov 2025 #5

See my post #7 above this one. AZJonnie Nov 2025 #9

and how do you know she wasn't under duress? Skittles Nov 2025 #14

Because it was in her 2025 memoir that she just wrote, and her estate released posthumously AZJonnie Nov 2025 #17

speak for yourself Skittles Nov 2025 #21

We are making the same point. Yes, she is gone, having exonerated him (to her knowledge) on her way out. AZJonnie Nov 2025 #23

It doesn't matter Boo1 Nov 2025 #16

I want to address this part of your post Quiet Em Nov 2025 #20

I get what you mean, but I was asked why *I* am so interested in the case near the top of the thread. AZJonnie Nov 2025 #24

You are not annoying me and no apology is required. Disaffected Nov 2025 #22

From what I've read, the "VICTIM" redaction was in the version of the files supplied by the estate, Emrys Nov 2025 #25

Not suggesting anyone tried to warp the facts, but mistakes can be made on a task like that AZJonnie Nov 2025 #26

It MIGHT be an inside joke, but to borrow the words of a past US president, "I want to hear him deny it." Emrys Nov 2025 #28

I've said this like 20 times in various posts over months but not everyone see everything, so again lol AZJonnie Nov 2025 #29

"the 'complete release of DoJ files' for any case is not a normal occurrence" Emrys Nov 2025 #30

Setting aside the details of our particular definitions of "great lengths", the point is we agree AZJonnie Nov 2025 #31

AZJohnny I agree with you that it wasn't Virginia Roberts Giuffre that Chump met at Epstein's house FakeNoose Nov 2025 #27