Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wiz Imp

(10,031 posts)
14. The purpose of a 50-year mortgage is to enrich the lenders while offering very little benefit to the home buyer
Fri Nov 14, 2025, 12:02 AM
Nov 2025

And if 50 year mortgages became remotely common, it would significantly inflate housing prices. Also, interest rates would be necessarily higher for 50 year mortgages which would nullify much of savings on monthly payments. So instead of helping with housing affordability, it would make things far worse. They are a terrible idea.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/nov/13/trump-50-year-mortgages-housing

The problem with a 50-year mortgage, to be clear, is that it does nothing to solve the root issues. Yes, you’ll have a lower monthly payment since the timeline is longer, but it’ll take you longer to build equity and you’ll pay double the amount of interest as someone with a 30-year mortgage, according to one analysis. Fifty-year mortgages could also increase housing prices in the long run by encouraging people to buy more expensive homes.


https://www.realtor.com/advice/finance/50-year-mortgage-calculator-generational-wealth/
“A 50-year mortgage inherently carries more risk, which is why it would have a higher interest rate than a 30-year mortgage,” explains Berner. "This could also combine with some of the other dynamics of the 50-year mortgage to make defaults riskier. In a situation where home values fall, on a 50-year mortgage where the homeowner has less equity in their home, they’re more likely to end up ‘underwater,' owing more on their home than it’s worth.”

Ultimately, as Yun explains, longer loan terms don’t actually address the “affordability challenges” faced by homeowners today. “Limited supply of homes in the low- and middle-price ranges” is the real hurdle.

A mortgage that stretches two decades beyond today’s 30-year norm would also come with the major drawback of making a significant dent in leaving generational wealth.

“Because equity accumulation is slower, in a situation where a homeowner passes away after a certain number of years of paying off a mortgage, if that homeowner has a 50-year mortgage, they will pass down less ownership of the home and more debt than they would on a 30-year mortgage,” Berner explains.


https://na.rdcpix.com/17c13dd3ad4c73a948b0082d043e459cw-c3935697592srd-w925_q80.avif
https://na.rdcpix.com/bd62305483d901fd593fb9549cd6e46bw-c1006572814srd-w925_q80.avif





Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Borrowers will have to dweller Nov 2025 #1
We die and leave the debt to our children, who probably don't even want the house FakeNoose Nov 2025 #2
I don't follow. You sell it in these instances. Same as if you had an unpaid 30 year mortgage. Melon Nov 2025 #5
My point is that a lot more people will die with mortgages unpaid FakeNoose Nov 2025 #7
But...who cares...really? People die or sell homes owing money everyday. The estate pays what is owed from the Melon Nov 2025 #8
Do many people stay in a home long enough to pay off their mortgage? Mark.b2 Nov 2025 #3
I thought I remembered 100 year mortgages in Japan. So I ran it through the machine: Hassin Bin Sober Nov 2025 #4
There are still going to be 30 year mortgages. 15 year mortgages. I don't see the issue. Melon Nov 2025 #6
This comes down to a question of drmeow Nov 2025 #9
I don't think so.People need choice. I looked at a certain right wing website earlier. Melon Nov 2025 #12
Yes, I do protest 7 year car loans drmeow Nov 2025 #16
The alternative is renting. At zero equity Melon Nov 2025 #17
The purpose of a 50-year mortgage is to enrich the lenders while offering very little benefit to the home buyer Wiz Imp Nov 2025 #14
Why not? From repuke perspective, they plan to have everyone work till they drop dead. SheltieLover Nov 2025 #10
It would mean they're basically renting their entire lives, and paying a humongous amount of interest. Sogo Nov 2025 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Nov 2025 #13
I would recommend taking the shortest mortgage you can afford. WarGamer Nov 2025 #15
That's a really, really bad idea. For the first 20 years of the mortgage you wouldn't even be touching the Vinca Nov 2025 #18
This is another stupid trump idea LetMyPeopleVote Nov 2025 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What a 50-Year Mortgage W...»Reply #14