Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Scrivener7

(58,100 posts)

18. Schuster got that from Michael Wolf, who is taking no end of shit right now, maybe rightfully,

Reply to aaaaaa5a (Original post)

Mon Nov 17, 2025, 08:49 AM

Nov 17

because another email seems to show him telling Epstein how to leverage the information he has on Cankles, both in the event that he loses and in the event that he wins the 2016 election.

I get the squeamishness, but Wolf's defense is that this is how you get close to a subject. You have to interact on their level to open them up so you can get the full story. While I couldn't do it, he does seem to have gotten more on Epstein and Cankles than any of the journalists going about it the traditional way.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

aaaaaa5a

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Honest Question. What if David Shuster is right? [View all] aaaaaa5a Nov 16 OP

Maga won't care, corruption and criminality is rampant with t-rump and his administration and supporters... wcmagumba Nov 16 #1

But...just maybe enough people will care to make a difference in our upcoming election, and go from there. electric_blue68 Nov 16 #2

This has become the default response but I don't think people should let them off that easy. BannonsLiver Nov 16 #14

The same David Shuster who got kicked off of MSNBC WarGamer Nov 16 #3

Yes. He has been reporting aaaaaa5a Nov 16 #6

He was a fixture on Keith's MSNBC show during Fitzmas, "reporting inside information" UTUSN Nov 16 #13

I can answer aaaaaa5a Nov 17 #17

"fair questions" usually have an implied, desired answer. Mine to those/here, I'm with "D" upper case, UTUSN Nov 17 #21

He is right mercuryblues Nov 16 #4

It wasn't released because maxwell Lifeafter70 Nov 16 #5

I expect redactions, but I also expect new sources of information from usonian Nov 16 #7

Fawk him.......kinda forgot what he said about Hillary and Bill Clinton's daughter..... a kennedy Nov 16 #8

I think it would depend on how long ago and how young she was Polybius Nov 16 #9

"If" is a very Big word. gab13by13 Nov 16 #10

not wasting any time on David Shuster stopdiggin Nov 16 #11

I think that would sway a small, yet noticeable, percentage of trump voters, especially those who swung late to trump. Silent Type Nov 16 #12

The journalist Michael Wolff says he has seen these pictures. Intractable Nov 16 #15

I am worried they are destroying the evidence. Nt aaaaaa5a Nov 17 #16

Schuster got that from Michael Wolf, who is taking no end of shit right now, maybe rightfully, Scrivener7 Nov 17 #18

Literally nothing will happen to him Orrex Nov 17 #19

Hmmmmmmmm malaise Nov 17 #20