Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Pro-Gun Blogger Retaliates Against Database By Publishing Newspaper Staff’s Personal Info [View all]spin
(17,493 posts)37. History shows how some people were forced to wear clothing for identification. ...
The Yellow Star
By Jennifer Rosenberg, About.com Guide
The yellow star, inscribed with the word "Jude," has become a symbol of Nazi persecution. Its likeness abounds upon Holocaust literature and materials. But the Jewish badge was not instituted in 1933 when Hitler came to power. It was not instituted in 1935 when the Nuremberg Laws stripped Jews of their citizenship. It was still not implemented by Kristallnacht in 1938. The oppression and labeling of the Jews by use of the Jewish badge did not begin until after the start of the Second World War. And even then, it began as local laws rather than as a unified Nazi policy.
***snip***
The Nazis rarely had an original idea. Almost always what made the Nazi policies different was that they intensified, magnified, and institutionalized the age-old methods of persecution.
The oldest reference to using mandatory articles of clothing to identify and distinguish Jews from the rest of society was in 807 CE. In this year, Abbassid caliph Haroun al-Raschid ordered all Jews to wear a yellow belt and a tall, cone-like hat.1
But it was in 1215 that the Fourth Lateran Council, presided over by Pope Innocent III, made its infamous decree. Canon 68 declare
Jews and Saracens [Muslims] of both sexes in every Christian province and at all times shall be marked off in the eyes of the public from other peoples through the character of their dress.2
http://history1900s.about.com/od/holocaust/a/yellowstar.htm
Now I am seriously doubting that you want 80,000,000 gun owners in our nation to be required to have tattoos on their foreheads or to wear armbands.
But I will advise you that many lurkers come to DU to understand how Democrats feel about current issues just as some DU members go to conservative websites such as FreeRepublic to read the foolish comments often posted there.
A comment such as yours might cause some to believe that the liberal and progressive folks who post here are willing to discriminate against those who disagree with their views.
I realize that you are emotionally upset at the recent massacres in schools and theaters and that is entirely understandable. I own firearms but I had a nightmare about the shooting at the school in Connecticut last night and I rarely have bad dreams. We do need to have an honest discussion on gun violence in our nation and if we all show at least some respect for those who disagree with us we might actually make some progress in addressing this issue.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Pro-Gun Blogger Retaliates Against Database By Publishing Newspaper Staff’s Personal Info [View all]
Purveyor
Dec 2012
OP
Sue the fucker. Sue all gun fuckers. Sue them back into the stone age where they belong. nt
onehandle
Dec 2012
#2
Unfortunately, the Bush/Cheney years misled some into believing that privacy is "quaint"
derby378
Dec 2012
#7
Great Idea Is To Publish National Maps Of All Gun Owners So I Can Steer Clear Before One Goes Postal
cantbeserious
Dec 2012
#5
That May Be True - But Knowing Who These People Are Means I Can Personally Shun Them
cantbeserious
Dec 2012
#38
Then All The Better Reason To Institute Mandatory Gun Registration Just Like Automobiles
cantbeserious
Dec 2012
#39
Publicly Available Information Of Gun Owners - Someone Is Leveraging That Data
cantbeserious
Dec 2012
#40
I have read where some of the people on the list have gotten phone calls and other communications
ProgressiveProfessor
Dec 2012
#10
No, I am finding amusement in journalists going through what they dish out
ProgressiveProfessor
Dec 2012
#13
"Its not like journalism is a real profession. There are no enforced standards or even rules."
Chorophyll
Dec 2012
#25
RWS said it well, information wants to be free and I agree that public information is indeed public
ProgressiveProfessor
Dec 2012
#30
I would have expect the so called journalists to not do what they did or accept similar treatment
ProgressiveProfessor
Dec 2012
#15
That level of privacy violation is not schoolyard childishness. However, since there is no viable
ProgressiveProfessor
Dec 2012
#18
and publishing photos, links to pics of their children and description of her car as well as the
bettyellen
Dec 2012
#27