Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unblock

(56,248 posts)
2. actually, the gerrymandering had a lot to do with it, as did the american voters.
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 01:40 AM
Dec 2012

the gerrymandering meant that many republicans are now in safe, partisan republican districts (having corralled the democrats into a small number of extremely safe democratic districts).

so they're no longer worried about losing to a democrat, they're now only worried about losing to another republican in the primary. so they're hell-bent on being extreme, regardless of what's in the nation's interest.


this puts them at odds with the rest of the republicans, who need a few democratic votes to get re-elected, or who actually have greater ambitions and need to have a more moderate track record.

this may be unintended consequences, but they did it to themselves quite by design.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Obama is destro...»Reply #2