Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

D Gary Grady

(133 posts)
9. It's actually not an unreasonable prediction
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 08:08 AM
Dec 2012

There's more evidence to support the prediction than one might think. We have now observed enough stars and found enough exoplanets to have a notion of the approximate statistical distributions involved (mass, semimajor axis, etc).

Based on that and the parameters of the observing program, it's possible to compute an estimate the likelihood of observing at least one planet that meets a given set of criteria (mass in a given range and so on). No, the estimate isn't exact, and even if it were exact it wouldn't be a guarantee, so such a prediction obviously isn't a sure thing. But it's also far from being a mere unsupported claim.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Earth’s twin will be disc...»Reply #9