Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

marmar

(79,070 posts)
Thu Dec 4, 2025, 10:00 AM Thursday

Medicare's new AI experiment sparks alarm among doctors, lawmakers [View all]


A Medicare pilot program will allow private companies to use artificial intelligence to review older Americans’ requests for certain medical care — and will reward the companies when they deny it.

In January, the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services will launch the Wasteful and Inappropriate Services Reduction (WISeR) Model to test AI-powered prior authorizations on certain health services for Medicare patients in six states: Arizona, New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas and Washington. The program is scheduled to last through 2031.

The program effectively inserts one of private insurance’s most unpopular features — prior authorization — into traditional Medicare, the federal health insurance program for people 65 and older and those with certain disabilities. Prior authorization is the process by which patients and doctors must ask health insurers to approve medical procedures or drugs before proceeding.

Adults over 65 generally have two options for health insurance: traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage. Both types of Medicare are funded with public dollars, but Medicare Advantage plans are contracted through private insurance companies. Medicare Advantage plans tend to cost less out of pocket, but patients enrolled in them often must seek prior authorization for care. .....................(more)

https://michiganadvance.com/2025/12/04/repub/medicares-new-ai-experiment-sparks-alarm-among-doctors-lawmakers/




40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kick dalton99a Thursday #1
They get paid to avoid providing care Bettie Thursday #2
Isn't it, though! (n/t) OldBaldy1701E Thursday #5
Traditional WmChris Thursday #3
Kicking with DISGUST!!!! Faux pas Thursday #4
One Goal Is Likely To Deny Coverage For Diabetes 2 And Its Related... ColoringFool Thursday #6
Jeezus. Joinfortmill Thursday #8
Any use of AI in a customer service context is to be feared. "Speak to a representative" is my answer to what I want to Martin68 Thursday #7
AI learns that there's a reward for denying coverage. SergeStorms Thursday #12
AI finds it more cost efficient to let us die faster IronLionZion Thursday #19
there is help for patients Nigrum Cattus Thursday #9
Could you please elaborate for those of us who are not inclined to readily click links? mahina Thursday #13
Wow! Thanks Nigrum Cattus! That's a great source for fighting insurance denials! BComplex Thursday #16
The problem isn't the availability of an appeal - Ms. Toad Thursday #20
Arizona is a swing state with lots of retirees IronLionZion Thursday #10
They will likely never hear about it, or understand it was REPUBLICANS who passed this BComplex Thursday #17
If they are looking for fraud and corruption instead popsdenver Thursday #11
They want us dead orangecrush Thursday #14
Who in the F*** authorized this change?? BComplex Thursday #15
Medicare has used private contractors to review claims since at least 1980. The pilot program is limited to 6 states Silent Type Thursday #18
Requiring conservative therapy is a Medicare Advantage/Insurance concept - it has no place in Standard Medicare Ms. Toad Thursday #21
Absolutly incorrect. Original Medicare has extensive coverage policies. No, the patient won't pay because it'll be Silent Type Thursday #22
Gotcha. You believe it is appropriate to force me to choose between Ms. Toad Thursday #25
How many of those services have anything to do with diagnosing or managing cancer? Plus, Silent Type Thursday #26
It was in my post - a skin graft. Ms. Toad Thursday #28
There is a new policy on skin substitutes that removes the incentive for doctors making thousands of dollars off Silent Type Friday #29
Nonsense. Ms. Toad Friday #31
None of those are life threatening conditions. Let's be honest here. No it's not fantasy that it will happen quickly Silent Type Friday #33
And just now would you know "none of those were life threatening' Ms. Toad Friday #34
Because I can read. None of those are life threatening and most are questionable efficacy. Have no problem telling Silent Type Saturday #35
Sorry, but you don't know what those dozens of appeals related to, Ms. Toad Saturday #36
Talking about list of procedures requiring authorization. None of those are life threatening. Silent Type Saturday #37
Except, of course the denial of a skin graft, which delays surgery for an aggressive cancer - Ms. Toad Saturday #38
If you read the procedures listed, it's for BIOENGINEERED skin substitutes, not skin grafts following cancer surgery. Silent Type Saturday #39
Very specific circumstances best known and evaluated by my own doctor, Ms. Toad Yesterday #40
Trump's government... LudwigPastorius Thursday #23
It's bad enough when some employee at an insurance company who is not a doctor IcyPeas Thursday #24
I love the name - WISeR. It's become a cliche to say that every pronouncement by this administration is Orwellian jls4561 Thursday #27
Crap UTUSN Friday #30
who needs a "death panel?" rampartd Friday #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Medicare's new AI experim...