Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Medicare's new AI experiment sparks alarm among doctors, lawmakers [View all]Ms. Toad
(38,039 posts)31. Nonsense.
And even if it were denied pending additional info, your doc will send in supporting documentation, measurements, skin product, many send photos of wounds especially for exceptionally long treatment. It will be approved within hours.
The point is that ANY delay is life-threatening. And it is kind of impossible to send photos of a wound that does not yet exist. The point is that the surgery would be delayed until approval for all components - including the graft - are obtained.
And the suggestion that approval would be granted within hours is pure fantasy. I've successfully appealed dozens of denials. (I've only lost one, which I ultimately decided wasn't the worth the continued fight.) Not a single one was granted within hours (even if you don't count the days or more it took to notify me of the denial). The longest took 8 months and over 200 hours of my time. The shortest, I believe, took approximately 3 weeks.
The tinkering with the codes to minimize damage should take place before any pre-authorization for medical care (other than treatment which doubles as cosmetic care) is imposed, not after it is implemented - and the damage has already been done. Anyone implementing a new computer system knows you run parallel systems until the bugs are worked out - you don't implement an untested program in mission critical situations. And medical care is about as mission-critical as it can get. The same standards should apply.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Any use of AI in a customer service context is to be feared. "Speak to a representative" is my answer to what I want to
Martin68
17 hrs ago
#7
Could you please elaborate for those of us who are not inclined to readily click links?
mahina
16 hrs ago
#13
Wow! Thanks Nigrum Cattus! That's a great source for fighting insurance denials!
BComplex
16 hrs ago
#16
They will likely never hear about it, or understand it was REPUBLICANS who passed this
BComplex
16 hrs ago
#17
Medicare has used private contractors to review claims since at least 1980. The pilot program is limited to 6 states
Silent Type
16 hrs ago
#18
Requiring conservative therapy is a Medicare Advantage/Insurance concept - it has no place in Standard Medicare
Ms. Toad
14 hrs ago
#21
Absolutly incorrect. Original Medicare has extensive coverage policies. No, the patient won't pay because it'll be
Silent Type
13 hrs ago
#22
How many of those services have anything to do with diagnosing or managing cancer? Plus,
Silent Type
6 hrs ago
#26
There is a new policy on skin substitutes that removes the incentive for doctors making thousands of dollars off
Silent Type
5 hrs ago
#29
It's bad enough when some employee at an insurance company who is not a doctor
IcyPeas
13 hrs ago
#24