Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ms. Toad

(38,039 posts)
31. Nonsense.
Fri Dec 5, 2025, 01:13 AM
4 hrs ago
And even if it were denied pending additional info, your doc will send in supporting documentation, measurements, skin product, many send photos of wounds especially for exceptionally long treatment. It will be approved within hours.


The point is that ANY delay is life-threatening. And it is kind of impossible to send photos of a wound that does not yet exist. The point is that the surgery would be delayed until approval for all components - including the graft - are obtained.

And the suggestion that approval would be granted within hours is pure fantasy. I've successfully appealed dozens of denials. (I've only lost one, which I ultimately decided wasn't the worth the continued fight.) Not a single one was granted within hours (even if you don't count the days or more it took to notify me of the denial). The longest took 8 months and over 200 hours of my time. The shortest, I believe, took approximately 3 weeks.

The tinkering with the codes to minimize damage should take place before any pre-authorization for medical care (other than treatment which doubles as cosmetic care) is imposed, not after it is implemented - and the damage has already been done. Anyone implementing a new computer system knows you run parallel systems until the bugs are worked out - you don't implement an untested program in mission critical situations. And medical care is about as mission-critical as it can get. The same standards should apply.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kick dalton99a 19 hrs ago #1
They get paid to avoid providing care Bettie 19 hrs ago #2
Isn't it, though! (n/t) OldBaldy1701E 17 hrs ago #5
Traditional WmChris 19 hrs ago #3
Kicking with DISGUST!!!! Faux pas 19 hrs ago #4
One Goal Is Likely To Deny Coverage For Diabetes 2 And Its Related... ColoringFool 17 hrs ago #6
Jeezus. Joinfortmill 17 hrs ago #8
Any use of AI in a customer service context is to be feared. "Speak to a representative" is my answer to what I want to Martin68 17 hrs ago #7
AI learns that there's a reward for denying coverage. SergeStorms 17 hrs ago #12
AI finds it more cost efficient to let us die faster IronLionZion 16 hrs ago #19
there is help for patients Nigrum Cattus 17 hrs ago #9
Could you please elaborate for those of us who are not inclined to readily click links? mahina 16 hrs ago #13
Wow! Thanks Nigrum Cattus! That's a great source for fighting insurance denials! BComplex 16 hrs ago #16
The problem isn't the availability of an appeal - Ms. Toad 14 hrs ago #20
Arizona is a swing state with lots of retirees IronLionZion 17 hrs ago #10
They will likely never hear about it, or understand it was REPUBLICANS who passed this BComplex 16 hrs ago #17
If they are looking for fraud and corruption instead popsdenver 17 hrs ago #11
They want us dead orangecrush 16 hrs ago #14
Who in the F*** authorized this change?? BComplex 16 hrs ago #15
Medicare has used private contractors to review claims since at least 1980. The pilot program is limited to 6 states Silent Type 16 hrs ago #18
Requiring conservative therapy is a Medicare Advantage/Insurance concept - it has no place in Standard Medicare Ms. Toad 14 hrs ago #21
Absolutly incorrect. Original Medicare has extensive coverage policies. No, the patient won't pay because it'll be Silent Type 13 hrs ago #22
Gotcha. You believe it is appropriate to force me to choose between Ms. Toad 6 hrs ago #25
How many of those services have anything to do with diagnosing or managing cancer? Plus, Silent Type 6 hrs ago #26
It was in my post - a skin graft. Ms. Toad 5 hrs ago #28
There is a new policy on skin substitutes that removes the incentive for doctors making thousands of dollars off Silent Type 5 hrs ago #29
Nonsense. Ms. Toad 4 hrs ago #31
Trump's government... LudwigPastorius 13 hrs ago #23
It's bad enough when some employee at an insurance company who is not a doctor IcyPeas 13 hrs ago #24
I love the name - WISeR. It's become a cliche to say that every pronouncement by this administration is Orwellian jls4561 6 hrs ago #27
Crap UTUSN 4 hrs ago #30
who needs a "death panel?" rampartd 1 hr ago #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Medicare's new AI experim...»Reply #31