Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(60,739 posts)
10. Would the Miami Herald have pursued the story?
Tue Dec 9, 2025, 10:35 AM
Tuesday

When Trump was elected, Epstein had been arrested, and had completed the jail required by the sweetheart deal. The charge he pled guilty to was a very small portion of what he was guilty of. Florida had swept its own investigation under the rug.

I don't know if the FBI continued any behind the scenes investigation after the GWB DOJ approved the sweetheart deal with its strange provision that if Epstein accepted the deal, several conspirators got immunity. It seems like those who designed that deal wanted to prevent any loose end being investigated and leading to exposing the entire operation.

I remember that when Epstein went to jail, many politicians he had earlier contributed to have an equivalent amount of money to charity. That action was what they did whenever any prior donor was shown to be bad. I don't remember reading anything that suggested he was leading a sex trafficking ring or even himself having raped many underage girls. I think the Miami Herald may have been the first to expose all of that.

From memory, the exception to that was that Epstein was key to the Katie Johnson story that Trump raped her which became public, but not completely mainstream in 2016 when Trump ran. Those accusations were about actions in NY. Even before the election, that woman withdrew the accusations and went into hiding.

The Miami Herald articles were about what Epstein and others did in Florida and were written in November 2018. Epstein was indicted and arrested in 2019 and Acosta, who gave him the sweetheart deal resigned as Labor Secretary then.

I suspect that had HRC been President, the exposure of Epstein by the Miami Herald would have led to the charges not just of Epstein, but of Maxwell and others. At least internally, the idea that Acosta and others above him in the GWB administration would have been investigated.

Without the MH or something else, it could have remained hidden. Consider that there did not seem to be any investigation of a plea deal with only one relatively minor charge granted by the Bush DOJ in the 8 Obama years. The deal may have very successfully hid everything until the newspaper exposed it.

So, whether Trump being president mattered, may go to what motivated Julie Brown to investigate and write the expose and the Miami Herald to publish it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would Jeffrey Epstein and...»Reply #10