Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Icanthinkformyself

(354 posts)

3. The loss of the funding may have not been an issue

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Tue Dec 9, 2025, 11:30 AM

Tuesday

now if the DLC hadn't abandoned working people and the middle class in the 1990s to cash in on all of that oligarch PAC money. I'm not sure how much more of the country that the robber barons can buy. They seem to own it all already.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court Asked to Ax More Campaign Finance Limits [View all] applegrove Tuesday OP

Supreme Court loves bribery, corruption, etc. Irish_Dem Tuesday #1

The speed that they are taking these cases................... Lovie777 Tuesday #2

The loss of the funding may have not been an issue Icanthinkformyself Tuesday #3

What case are they deciding? William Seger Tuesday #4

Democrats had the advantage in getting lower ad costs applegrove Tuesday #5

Thanks -- it helps to know why we should be worried (nt) William Seger Tuesday #6

Montana state law limits corporate contributions to political candidates...why can't other states follow suit? pecosbob Tuesday #7