Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

William Seger

(12,132 posts)

4. What case are they deciding?

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Tue Dec 9, 2025, 12:15 PM

Tuesday

Nothing in that article, and only one line in the original NYT story:

"The case the justices are hearing on Tuesday involves one of the remaining limits: how much money political parties can spend in coordination with candidates."

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court Asked to Ax More Campaign Finance Limits [View all] applegrove Tuesday OP

Supreme Court loves bribery, corruption, etc. Irish_Dem Tuesday #1

The speed that they are taking these cases................... Lovie777 Tuesday #2

The loss of the funding may have not been an issue Icanthinkformyself Tuesday #3

What case are they deciding? William Seger Tuesday #4

Democrats had the advantage in getting lower ad costs applegrove Tuesday #5

Thanks -- it helps to know why we should be worried (nt) William Seger Tuesday #6

Montana state law limits corporate contributions to political candidates...why can't other states follow suit? pecosbob Tuesday #7