Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
5. Part of the reason may be tradition.
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 01:34 PM
Dec 2012

Crops have been genetically modified for centuries. It is impossible to find a food crop today that doesn't have genetic modification in it's lineage, that includes so called "organic" seeds.

But historical genetic modification involved transfer of pollen from one variety of a plant to another. This is how the first drought resistant corn was produced, and how every type of tomato that is sold at the grocer or farmer's markets were produced. Transfer of pollen resulted in genetic modification in the resulting plant, by adding a gene that it didn't have or adding a gene that caused suppression of one or more genes.

What is new is gene splicing where scientists actively alter genes in a matter of seconds.

I am not one that get excited about GMO crops, mostly because some version of what is being done has happened for a long time and the results are part of our food supply. What I do think is important is companies that are buying genetically modified seed state that as part of the information available on the labels of the products they they ultimately produce - in this case, people that don't want to consume newly genetically modified crops can instead choose from the many that were genetically modified centuries or decades ago.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If GMOs are so safe and so healthy... [View all] leftlibdem420 Dec 2012 OP
GMO = occult Genetically Mutant foodlike crapola Berlum Dec 2012 #1
That is an over statement. We have had GM crops for centuries. bluestate10 Dec 2012 #8
If they are so wonderful then, why do Monsanto and Dupont et al Cleita Dec 2012 #12
For centuries? Bwaa ha ha ha. That's the standard corporate spin on mutant food Berlum Dec 2012 #16
GMO in this case means direct DNA manipulation which didn't exist until the 70's. JFC. laundry_queen Dec 2012 #17
Remember Anderson KT2000 Dec 2012 #2
In theory, I have no problem with GMOs. leftlibdem420 Dec 2012 #3
I am close to you camp. GMO crops have been in our food supply for centuries. bluestate10 Dec 2012 #6
You are intentionally being disingenuous and purposely trying to confuse the issues Occulus Dec 2012 #15
Cross breeding plants is one thing, splicing animal genes into veggies is another. I do not peacebird Dec 2012 #7
Many seem to be conflating GMO with cross breeding. Misleading and probably dishonest. byeya Dec 2012 #11
Monsanto & Co. should be extolling roody Dec 2012 #4
Part of the reason may be tradition. bluestate10 Dec 2012 #5
Then why are GMO crop producers afraid of being labeled as such? n/t Cleita Dec 2012 #13
I don't think so. Creating a plant that is resistant to a herbicide by either adding genetic byeya Dec 2012 #14
I assume this is salmon related. Igel Dec 2012 #9
When I was a kid the only seedless grapes were tiny and green. Nye Bevan Dec 2012 #10
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If GMOs are so safe and s...»Reply #5