Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why anti-gun laws will never work in US [View all]JohnnyRingo
(21,048 posts)153. I believe collecting guns door to door...
..would be a frustrating and dangerous job. Plus, with three hundred million guns in the country, the logistics are staggering.
Imagine the scene at a gun owner's home when the ATF agents arrive:
"I'm here to collect your now banned firearms."
"How much are you paying for them?"
"Uhhh.. nothing sir, you forfeit that money you paid for them"
"I sold them a few years ago at a gun show to settle a gambling debt"
"OK, thank you sir, have a nice day."
And that's how someone stable, someone who respects the government, would respond. Imagine how twitchy an agent would be when the owner walks up to the door with his Beretta in hand. That's a job that would void a life insurance policy.
Of course the ATF could get a search warrant, but imagine the court backlog with so many cases. The agents would have to tell the owner: "We'll be back next year to look for ourselves".
If the govt decides search warrants take too long, it's too dangerous to collect them, and people think they should just be able to push past the resident and search the home immediately, then maybe there's a point to those who think we need guns to protect themselves from a future dictatorship.
I believe common sense regulations like dealers-only sales, waiting periods to prevent spur of the moment crimes, and federal background checks, are positive steps in the right direction.
Those who think we should ban all guns immediately should start with something "easy", like nuclear weapons. At least they'd only have to talk to seven people, and we know how many they have. Plus, they can't say they sold them at a flea market. Idealism feels good, but it's not interchangeable with realism.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
182 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Not to mention the government's track record is quite poor when it comes to banning things
davidn3600
Dec 2012
#2
Precisely. It's an "accident" when cars kill people. Guns are designed for one goal
Lex
Dec 2012
#21
ahhhh, weapons are your business. so you personally profit more with less regulations
bettyellen
Dec 2012
#88
Umm, I am not in the personal weapons business. Sorry to dissapoint.
OneTenthofOnePercent
Dec 2012
#92
Uh yeah, except you said "the NRA is trying to restore gun rights to convicted felons", not...
beevul
Dec 2012
#113
Seriously! This is the third post today with the same lame NRA talking point. They're out in force
Squinch
Dec 2012
#35
It might take 50 years to have an impact, but doing nothing will just put more on street.
Hoyt
Dec 2012
#12
Spouses of Denizens from Gungeon excepted. Would you give up your guns, if you thought it would
Hoyt
Dec 2012
#117
Would you give someone a gun for protection if you knew it would save their life?
rl6214
Dec 2012
#144
I doubt you can come up with plausible scenario like that, but gun cultists obviously aren't
Hoyt
Dec 2012
#146
I notice you and your gungeon buddies aren't posting your monthly celebration of more guns
Hoyt
Dec 2012
#118
I have a gun for protection. I would be more easily persuaded to give it up IF....
Honeycombe8
Dec 2012
#20
I vote your post as the most rational, most logical, most practical on this thread
golfguru
Dec 2012
#75
I'm sure it had nothing to do with anti-gun ideologues being nominated for the position.
beevul
Dec 2012
#103
We pass laws to set a clear limit of what is and is not acceptable to maintain public safety.
Agnosticsherbet
Dec 2012
#78
Nobody from the President to Congress or the Senate have called for banning all guns.
Agnosticsherbet
Dec 2012
#85
Don't even pretend there has been any attempt to keep guns out of the hands of criminals
BainsBane
Dec 2012
#74
Defeatist bullshit. If we can get 50% off the street, let's do it. 30%, it is worth it.
morningfog
Dec 2012
#105
You're missing the point - the convicted criminals aren't massacring scores of people at a time.
dutchroll
Dec 2012
#134
Believe he meant: We had terrible public policy;therefore must continue to have it.
Disgraceland
Dec 2012
#154