Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

gab13by13

(30,989 posts) Wed Dec 10, 2025, 10:31 PM Dec 10

62

The Employment Numbers Are being Fudged, So Says Jerome Powell [View all]

The claim that the numbers are bogus is coming from an extremely reliable source.

The bogus numbers are not even close to the real numbers.

The bogus numbers - 40,000 jobs created per month since April.

The real numbers could be - a loss of 20,000 jobs per month, according to Jerome Powell.

Unfuckingbelievable how evil these people are.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/fed-chair-jerome-powell-says-us-may-be-drastically-overstating-jobs-numbers/ar-AA1S7cFs?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=HCTS&cvid=693a383a3df14270accddc4a6ba9defc&ei=114

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Employment Numbers Are being Fudged, So Says Jerome Powell [View all] gab13by13 Dec 10 OP

No effn doubt that ALL negative numbers are being fudged vapor2 Dec 10 #1

Didn't Krasnov just hold an economic rally in the Poconos, gab13by13 Dec 10 #2

BLS numbers have not been "fudged" and Jerome Powell did not Wiz Imp Thursday #15

Did you read the supplied link ? KS Toronado Thursday #20

Thank you. You're right, he did not. And a technical note from the BLS on the size of sampling error progree Thursday #22

Kick dalton99a Dec 10 #3

Read an article on Yahoo the other day... Xolodno Dec 10 #4

That is absolutely NOT what they said. Wiz Imp Thursday #14

Think we may have read two different articles. Xolodno Thursday #21

You may be right, but they both referred to the same rport from Challenger. Wiz Imp Thursday #25

You don't have to explain it to me. Xolodno Thursday #34

The article doesn't say that has anything to do with Trump EdmondDantes_ Dec 10 #5

BLS has had since April to revise its numbers down, gab13by13 Dec 10 #6

The same amount of time every other president does EdmondDantes_ Thursday #23

I don't remember when Biden was president that those numbers had to be lowered, gab13by13 Thursday #27

Because your memory isn't accurate is my guess EdmondDantes_ Thursday #31

Does this include the 911,000 downward revision over the period April 2024 through March 2025 progree Friday #35

and does this include the 589,000 downward benchmark revision from April 2023 thru March 2024? progree Friday #36

Wall St. Will listen to Powell, not Trump. Nt Fiendish Thingy Dec 10 #7

This is why Powell is lowering interest rates, gab13by13 Dec 10 #8

Every month, they re-state previous months' numbers... Mark.b2 Dec 10 #9

You obviously know nothing about how sample based estimates are derived. Wiz Imp Thursday #13

The only thing I know is the quality of the estimates... Mark.b2 Thursday #19

The estimates are based on a relatively small statistical sample Wiz Imp Thursday #26

Thank you! Very interesting and helpful. Nt Mark.b2 Thursday #32

AND popsdenver Thursday #10

I was in post office yesterday to mail Christmas stuff tavernier Thursday #24

Nope popsdenver Thursday #33

The Fed lowers interest rates when the economy is doing badly. It's to stimulate the economy IronLionZion Thursday #11

You sound exactly like Trump Wiz Imp Thursday #12

I simply want you to explain one fact for me, gab13by13 Thursday #28

I wouldn't trust any figures Figarosmom Thursday #16

This is why I think a lot of magas are now quitting. C Moon Thursday #17

why does it say the US Skittles Thursday #18

I am not backing down, gab13by13 Thursday #29

Investors rely on the accuracy of these numbers lame54 Thursday #30

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Employment Numbers Ar...