Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 02:46 PM Dec 2012

There Are Days... When You Wonder Why We Even Bother... [View all]

Obama Administration Seeks to Strengthen Rupert Murdoch
Matt Stoller - NakedCapitalism
12/27/12

Earlier this year, Obama Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski proposed relaxing media ownership rules to allow Rupert Murdoch to buy the Los Angeles Times and Chicago Tribune. It’s not something you’ll see discussed much, because Republicans like the fact that Murdoch is going to get more power, while Democrats don’t want to admit that Obama is helping the person framed as their arch-nemesis. This is part of a larger pattern – media consolidation is one of the many structural problems that Obama promised to deal with. And indeed, this is the real arena where the battle over free speech is being fought. Corporate control over our communications infrastructure is the free speech question of our time.


<And>

On a more fundamental level, media consolidation and free speech are indistinguishable problems, and liberals have avoided the intellectual conundrum this presents. For while there are periodic flare-ups of the debate free speech rights, very rarely does anyone take the time to analyze the economics of speech. The controversy about Eric Loomis, a professor who spoke out obnoxiously and aggressively against the NRA and then had his academic career threatened as a result, is the latest round in kicking up a free speech debate. But this controversy is far less consequential than questions of how the corporate sector uses free speech rights. The first amendment is not actually an affirmative right to speak. It is written as the government’s inability to make any laws restricting the right to freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom to peaceably assemble, or to petition one’s government. Obviously the government makes rules all the time on the first amendment – that’s what a permit for a march, parade, or protest is. And it makes rules on speech on a regular basis, it just so happens that these are rules about who owns and runs the telecommunications and cable industries.


<And...>

Corporate control over our communications infrastructure is the free speech question of our time. When Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder refuses to investigate Rupert Murdoch’s company for bribery in the phone hacking scandal, and Obama’s FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski works to help Rupert Murdoch’s company buy more media assets, and the number of broadcast media outlets owned by minorities continues to decline, it’s clear we have a free speech problem. But it has nothing to do with a comment on twitter or burning flags.


More: http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/12/obama-administration-seeks-to-strengthen-rupert-murdoch.html

***************************************************************************************

And from 11/29/12...

Obama's FCC Set to Give Rupert Murdoch a Media Monopoly
Thursday, 29 November 2012 14:35
By Thom Hartmann and Sam Sacks, The Daily Take

<snip>

Unsatisfied with his media empire in the UK and Australia and his several media holdings in the United States like TheWall Street Journal, the New York Post, and Fox News, Rupert Murdoch wants more. He wants a media monopoly.

Murdoch is currently jockeying to buy the Los Angeles Times and the Chicago Tribune, which just so happen to be the largest newspapers in the nation’s second and third largest cities. That will add to his current media empire in the United States, which includes the most watched cable news network in the nation, Fox so-called News, and the most circulated newspaper in the nation, The Wall Street Journal.

The only thing standing in Murdoch’s way of full-spectrum media domination in America are Federal Communication Commission rules that forbid one company from owning both a newspaper and a television station in one community. Murdoch already owns local television stations in both Chicago and Los Angeles.

But according to sources within the FCC, Chairman Julius Genachowski is quietly planning to scrap those rules. Under pressure from major media moguls like Murdoch, who see big bucks and huge political power in a consolidated national and local media, Genachowski circulated a new order to other FCC Commissioners that would allow for cross-ownership of TV and newspapers in the nation’s twenty biggest media markets.

A similar effort was made in 2007 by George W. Bush’s FCC, but it was shot down after the Senate voted to repeal it and a federal court blocked it. Not to mention, 99% of the public comments the FCC received opposed that media consolidation effort.

But, undeterred, Murdoch and other media moguls kept lobbying, and now President Obama’s FCC is expected to consider these rule changes again in December. And if Americans don’t get involved in this issue and pressure the FCC to say “no,” then Murdoch and his billionaire buddies will likely get what they want, which is complete domination of our news media.

<snip>

More: http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/13051-obamas-fcc-set-to-give-rupert-murdoch-a-media-monopoly






92 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why do we even call them "liberals" anymore? villager Dec 2012 #1
There are exceptions. Jackpine Radical Dec 2012 #3
That's what's so sad, Jackpine -- they occupy the role that liberal-leaning Repubs did in the 70's villager Dec 2012 #4
Seems to be so. xchrom Dec 2012 #2
I remember, when it became clear that Obama opposed the Fairness Doctrine Enrique Dec 2012 #5
Saw that yesterday and was too disgusted to even think about it. sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #6
Matt Stoller is an anti-Obama idiot ProSense Dec 2012 #7
If You Say So... And Thom Hartmann ??? WillyT Dec 2012 #9
I read it: ProSense Dec 2012 #10
Thom Hartmann hjas gone very CTish of late. RomneyLies Dec 2012 #65
REALLY ??? - Links Please !!! WillyT Dec 2012 #74
No links, listen to his show n/t RomneyLies Dec 2012 #79
Part Of Being An American... Is Addressing Our Grievances... WillyT Dec 2012 #80
WTF does that have to do with the fact that Thom Hartmann has gone all CTish? RomneyLies Dec 2012 #81
Well... When You Have An Un-abiding Respect For A Politician... This Is A Possible Outcome... WillyT Dec 2012 #83
I have no idea what you're talking about, so here's a picture of a bunny with a pancake on its head RomneyLies Dec 2012 #84
Well I am with you Pro Sense - truedelphi Dec 2012 #15
Editorial: The FCC blinks, for now, at media consolidation ProSense Dec 2012 #20
I took a look at this link earlier, shook my head, janx Dec 2012 #59
Funny how suddenly Matt Stoller, who used to be such a blind partisan, is now sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #88
+ 1,000,000,000... What You Said !!! WillyT Dec 2012 #91
The FCC has more things to worry about... Comrade_McKenzie Dec 2012 #8
I wish more people understood the immense harm that was caused by media consolidation! bluethruandthru Dec 2012 #11
True, but ProSense Dec 2012 #12
My major concern is radio. bluethruandthru Dec 2012 #13
You are exactly right. Bozvotros Dec 2012 #19
Thanks Democrats. nt limpyhobbler Dec 2012 #14
Patrick Leahy and eight other Democrats have requested the FCC not to proceed pnwmom Dec 2012 #29
Actually no I was sarcastically thanking the Obama administration. limpyhobbler Dec 2012 #43
Maybe you should thank the FCC because they do have a response to the claims. pnwmom Dec 2012 #69
FCC: thank you for showing up at work ? limpyhobbler Dec 2012 #70
Please tell me that there are still true liberals out there in politicsland somewhere. jillan Dec 2012 #16
Of course there are. merrily Dec 2012 #49
We're getting run off of DU Doctor_J Dec 2012 #72
Sad that DU is turning into a Moderate Republican or BLUE DOG site! DearHeart Dec 2012 #82
Only because the president is a moderate Republican Doctor_J Dec 2012 #85
Wrong is wrong, regardless of party! Well said! DearHeart Dec 2012 #87
All I have to say is Blue_In_AK Dec 2012 #17
+1 limpyhobbler Dec 2012 #44
They are working on it. woo me with science Dec 2012 #67
Speaking of Occupy, Blue_In_AK Dec 2012 #68
OMFG libodem Dec 2012 #18
How long before they set their sights on the internet? 1620rock Dec 2012 #21
Yep, exactly, and they already have. The internet will succumb to this too, it's just a matter RKP5637 Dec 2012 #42
The internets is their biggest threat right now. Last Stand Dec 2012 #75
+ 1,000,000,000... What You Said !!! - K & R !!! WillyT Dec 2012 #77
Obama is nothing more than a cunning politician AZ Progressive Dec 2012 #22
He is a corporate Trojan Horse, woo me with science Dec 2012 #23
Sometimes it seems that the only difference between Democrats and Republicans AZ Progressive Dec 2012 #26
Yes. The two-party system is a scam now, a "good cop"/"bad cop" game, woo me with science Dec 2012 #30
Thanks For The Article... I think... WillyT Dec 2012 #34
I've thought about this since a long time ago AZ Progressive Dec 2012 #36
No, we can't afford it anymore. woo me with science Dec 2012 #40
Change? Yep, change is happening all of the time, but not the change many of us envisioned. n/t RKP5637 Dec 2012 #45
Showing your ProSense Dec 2012 #27
Obamacare is pro-corporatist AZ Progressive Dec 2012 #31
It's ProSense Dec 2012 #39
I heard today that increasing taxes on incomes over $250K will be enough for one week. merrily Dec 2012 #51
Sadly, the SCOTUS took away the one leverage that the feds had to persuade states merrily Dec 2012 #54
Absolutely. That poster will defend anything this administration does, woo me with science Dec 2012 #41
You on the other hand ProSense Dec 2012 #46
Shhhhh! Don't tell people about the ACA deductable ...that they can't afford to pay. L0oniX Dec 2012 #50
You're not kidding. I'm paying $775/month in premiums liberal_at_heart Dec 2012 #89
I opted out of this jury service. JaneyVee Dec 2012 #37
Survey says... L0oniX Dec 2012 #48
DU knows exactly what is going on, woo me with science Dec 2012 #53
True, but in the hands of other jurors, the post may have been hidden. merrily Dec 2012 #63
Woot Woot n/t Oilwellian Dec 2012 #61
Every stroke you take, you hate him, doncha. Got any better ideas? babylonsister Dec 2012 #76
This report is a month old. In fairness, you could have had included the FCC response. pnwmom Dec 2012 #24
Including that wouldn't allow for the appropriate amount of anti-Obama outrage to be generated...nt SidDithers Dec 2012 #62
Exactly the kind of response you would expect from the FCC under its sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #92
well that ought to make the media completely obsolete, i mean who really listens to them now? No Compromise Dec 2012 #25
I've said before that Obama was not on our side FiveGoodMen Dec 2012 #28
In your opinion, but President Obama ProSense Dec 2012 #33
If you remember, Obama was for DOMA before he was against it. FiveGoodMen Dec 2012 #35
President Obama was never in a postition to reject DOMA. Only Clinton was, and he signed it. DOMA merrily Dec 2012 #56
He is a corporate Trojan Horse. woo me with science Dec 2012 #38
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service... countryjake Dec 2012 #60
And this little piggy went... Oilwellian Dec 2012 #66
NOT an excuse. An explanation: When so many people from across the full political spectrum are soooo patrice Dec 2012 #32
You can't fix corrupt. - K&R n/t DeSwiss Dec 2012 #47
Color me not remotely surprised...We plethoro Dec 2012 #52
Why in the world libodem Dec 2012 #55
Sources, people--sources. n/t janx Dec 2012 #57
updare this old IWW poster with some media/FCC icons @ the We Fool You level hmmm? lunasun Dec 2012 #58
Julius Genachowski was a lousy appointment, IMO. Read his wiki. merrily Dec 2012 #64
We should have heeded his words Doctor_J Dec 2012 #71
Me Too... How Many 'Headless Nails" Do We Have In This Administration ??? WillyT Dec 2012 #73
What choice do we have? malz Dec 2012 #78
No doubt it's a chess move. Octafish Dec 2012 #86
Which dimensional chess is it now? Look...I wanna be hopeful...but SHEESH..the news keeps getting KoKo Dec 2012 #90
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There Are Days... When Yo...