General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Matt Damon: ‘Game is rigged’ [View all]JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Any time I use that phrase (conversion of energy infrastructure), the first most easily available new energy sources I think of are
1) efficiency gains (especially in buildings) and elimination of at least some bullshit consumption (starting with the maintenance of a costly military empire), plus some viable tech like smart grids, etc.
2) railways and mass transit measures, carfree zones in urban areas
3) less work, less sprawl & commuting (a book's worth of details)
followed by
4) solar power generation and and solar hydrogen development
5) wind, tides, non-destructive hydro and geothermal
Clearly this means an enormous shift in societal values.
Clearly, if it doesn't intend and actually seek to implement an end to fracking, MTR, shale-oil, ocean floor drilling, internal combustion in urban areas, and power generation from hydrocarbon burning within a transition time of a generation, it's bullshit.
I'm sure we can agree on the outlines. As to whether it will work - whatever. You got a better alternative? Does it involve depopulation?