Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: There Are Days... When You Wonder Why We Even Bother... [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)20. Editorial: The FCC blinks, for now, at media consolidation
Editorial: The FCC blinks, for now, at media consolidation
Stealth plans by the Federal Communications Commission to sneak a vote on weakening media-ownership rules were challenged by angry senators.
RELAXING long-standing restrictions on cross-ownership of newspapers and broadcast outlets is a bad idea. Apparently, it cannot be said often enough.
The chairman of Federal Communications Commission was flirting with a quick, quiet vote to undo a 37-year-old rule that prevents newspapers, radio and TV stations from falling under one owner in the same market.
<...>
Rules to limit media cross-ownership are in place to protect the publics interest in vigorous journalism, independent voices and diverse ownership.
The smoke still billows off a November letter from Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., to FCC chairman Julius Genachowski. The senator was incensed by FCC chatter about liberating cross-ownership to end outdated prohibitions.
- more -
http://seattletimes.com/html/editorials/2019906797_editfccownershipxml.html
Stealth plans by the Federal Communications Commission to sneak a vote on weakening media-ownership rules were challenged by angry senators.
RELAXING long-standing restrictions on cross-ownership of newspapers and broadcast outlets is a bad idea. Apparently, it cannot be said often enough.
The chairman of Federal Communications Commission was flirting with a quick, quiet vote to undo a 37-year-old rule that prevents newspapers, radio and TV stations from falling under one owner in the same market.
<...>
Rules to limit media cross-ownership are in place to protect the publics interest in vigorous journalism, independent voices and diverse ownership.
The smoke still billows off a November letter from Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., to FCC chairman Julius Genachowski. The senator was incensed by FCC chatter about liberating cross-ownership to end outdated prohibitions.
- more -
http://seattletimes.com/html/editorials/2019906797_editfccownershipxml.html
Matt Stoller is still an anti-Obama idiot.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That's what's so sad, Jackpine -- they occupy the role that liberal-leaning Repubs did in the 70's
villager
Dec 2012
#4
WTF does that have to do with the fact that Thom Hartmann has gone all CTish?
RomneyLies
Dec 2012
#81
Well... When You Have An Un-abiding Respect For A Politician... This Is A Possible Outcome...
WillyT
Dec 2012
#83
I have no idea what you're talking about, so here's a picture of a bunny with a pancake on its head
RomneyLies
Dec 2012
#84
Funny how suddenly Matt Stoller, who used to be such a blind partisan, is now
sabrina 1
Dec 2012
#88
I wish more people understood the immense harm that was caused by media consolidation!
bluethruandthru
Dec 2012
#11
Please tell me that there are still true liberals out there in politicsland somewhere.
jillan
Dec 2012
#16
Yep, exactly, and they already have. The internet will succumb to this too, it's just a matter
RKP5637
Dec 2012
#42
Sometimes it seems that the only difference between Democrats and Republicans
AZ Progressive
Dec 2012
#26
Yes. The two-party system is a scam now, a "good cop"/"bad cop" game,
woo me with science
Dec 2012
#30
Change? Yep, change is happening all of the time, but not the change many of us envisioned. n/t
RKP5637
Dec 2012
#45
I heard today that increasing taxes on incomes over $250K will be enough for one week.
merrily
Dec 2012
#51
Sadly, the SCOTUS took away the one leverage that the feds had to persuade states
merrily
Dec 2012
#54
Absolutely. That poster will defend anything this administration does,
woo me with science
Dec 2012
#41
Shhhhh! Don't tell people about the ACA deductable ...that they can't afford to pay.
L0oniX
Dec 2012
#50
This report is a month old. In fairness, you could have had included the FCC response.
pnwmom
Dec 2012
#24
Including that wouldn't allow for the appropriate amount of anti-Obama outrage to be generated...nt
SidDithers
Dec 2012
#62
well that ought to make the media completely obsolete, i mean who really listens to them now?
No Compromise
Dec 2012
#25
President Obama was never in a postition to reject DOMA. Only Clinton was, and he signed it. DOMA
merrily
Dec 2012
#56
NOT an excuse. An explanation: When so many people from across the full political spectrum are soooo
patrice
Dec 2012
#32
updare this old IWW poster with some media/FCC icons @ the We Fool You level hmmm?
lunasun
Dec 2012
#58