Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In a now locked thread, critical of DUers, critical President Obama ... [View all]grantcart
(53,061 posts)136. They were not spontaneous, they were 20 years in the making:
Not sure that this really changes the point anyone is making but simply want to clarify the mythology of Rosa being
an accidental actor in the civil rights struggle.
She had been active for 2 decades and knew exactly what she was provoking when she sat down on that bench, just another step in her long march for freedom. She started in private in the 1930s but by the 1940s was a very public actor in the civil rights movement, public in a state where being public could be a death warrant.
http://inamerica.blogs.cnn.com/2012/12/01/opinion-its-time-to-free-rosa-parks-from-the-bus/
In the 1930s, Rosa Parks joined her husband Raymond and others in secret meetings to defend the Scottsboro boysnine young African-American men accused of raping two white women in Alabama in 1931. In the 1940s, they hosted Voter League meetings, where they encouraged neighbors to register even though it was a dangerous task. In 1943, she joined the Montgomery NAACP and was elected branch secretary. The job required Parks to investigate and document acts of racist and sexist brutality.
It was in this context, in 1944, that Rosa Parks investigated the brutal gang-rape of Recy Taylor, a black woman from Abbeville, Alabama.
Parks took Taylors testimony back to Montgomery, where she and other activists organized the Committee for Equal Justice for Mrs. Recy Taylor. They launched what the Chicago Defender called the strongest campaign for equal justice to be seen in a decade. In 1948, she gave a fiery speech at the state NAACP convention criticizing President Harry Trumans civil rights initiatives. No one should feel proud, she said, when Negroes every day are being molested.
Foot fatigue played no role when she refused to relinquish her seat on December 1, 1955. There had to be a stopping place, she said, and this seemed to be the place for me to stop being pushed around. I had decided that I would have to know once and for all what rights I had as a human being and a citizen, even in Montgomery, Alabama.
Constant death threats forced her to leave Alabama in 1957. When she arrived in Detroit she continued working as an activist. Throughout the late 1960s and early 1970s, she worked to secure Black Power, fought for open housing and against police brutality, railed against the war in Vietnam, and campaigned for George McGovern. She was an ardent fan of Malcolm X and Robert F. Williams, a militant NAACP leader from North Carolina who advocated armed self-reliance. She admired Williams so much that she delivered the eulogy at his funeral in 1996.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
182 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In a now locked thread, critical of DUers, critical President Obama ... [View all]
1StrongBlackMan
Dec 2012
OP
The initial response was spontaneous, but it was what happened afterward that made the event importa
OmahaBlueDog
Dec 2012
#15
she was naacp secretary. they'd been looking for test cases for a bus boycott for some time
HiPointDem
Dec 2012
#98
I don't think the people who participated in that "street action" were particularly "progressive,"
MADem
Dec 2012
#83
No, I am not saying that at all. I am saying that progressive values were not the impetus for the
MADem
Dec 2012
#141
From Bayard Rustin's 'From Montgomery To Stonewall'- just to add more from Rustin, for the OP
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2012
#9
He also knew and spoke at length about the fact that activism toward legislative changes can
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2012
#22
Social Security was incremental. It didn't initially provide universal coverage
KittyWampus
Dec 2012
#146
Unbelievable. What I posted is factually correct yet you decide to try and argue.
KittyWampus
Dec 2012
#154
bears repeating for the deniers of the very important slights in that initial bill
bigtree
Dec 2012
#164
then your opposition to the ACA health insurance act must follow the same logic
bigtree
Dec 2012
#176
I remember a president sending federal troops to integrate schools in the South
Fumesucker
Dec 2012
#3
I'd think that would be because there isn't a complete breakdown in the justice system
bigtree
Dec 2012
#7
You're right, it would be much easier today to organize to fight forced integration
Fumesucker
Dec 2012
#52
well, we can't pretend that every initiative and action by the federal government was beneficial
bigtree
Dec 2012
#67
I see the disinfectant working the other way, I grew up in that time and place
Fumesucker
Dec 2012
#61
What is the point you are trying to make about Stonewall? Do you know what happened that night?
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2012
#4
I have posted a few links about Stonewall which I do not expect you to have courage to read
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2012
#13
"they didn't do anything but organize others' vs 'it was not planned as the other actions were'.
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2012
#36
Well you are not being clear at all. Your OP did not even provide a link for context to the thread
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2012
#58
You are the one who made Stonewall rhetorical football of your screed here today. Not me.
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2012
#156
Of course not, you'd rather flame all the Progressives that make up the majority of the board
MessiahRp
Dec 2012
#134
People protested injustice back then b/c they had unbiased reporting that told them about it!
Dustlawyer
Dec 2012
#29
FDR was bold and progressive, but he left a lot of people out in the cold on Social Security
bigtree
Dec 2012
#46
Thanks for your post. I think some tend to over romanticize the fights of the past.
Tarheel_Dem
Dec 2012
#60
Everything you wrote was on the money and substantiated pretty well. Why was the origional locked?
marble falls
Dec 2012
#43
We forget it because it leaves the rest of us out. It is not a valid argument for chained cpi.
madfloridian
Dec 2012
#102
No, Carney does NOT say Obama included exemptions in his proposal. He says he "WOULD" include them..
Honeycombe8
Dec 2012
#170
Since that's your reply to my reply to the original post that you're quoting there,
Blue_In_AK
Dec 2012
#86
He wasn't criticizing you Jim he was making a humorous comment on the poll worker
grantcart
Dec 2012
#137
It seems like there is not a clear division between "holding feet to the fire" and...
Taverner
Dec 2012
#159
Perfect thread. Your knowledge and sound grasp of the facts is exactly what I've come to expect
Number23
Dec 2012
#166
Correct, change comes from the people, the government does not willingly reform itself.
bemildred
Dec 2012
#177