Slain woman predicted her own death

[Kali]

70. ...

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service

Mail Message
At Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:10 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

I was juror number 4
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2083619

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)

ALERTER'S COMMENTS:

How common is it for a juror to post the jury results like this? Don't you guys have some sort of propriety about these things? Justin is making you all look like high school detention pranksters.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:21 PM, and the Jury voted 0-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: it is very common, especially on stupid alerts - like this one. you guys? maybe you are on the wrong website?
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: WTF, This is just as frivolous as the 'lord's name in vain' alert.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: People post jury results all the fucking time. Half of Meta is postings of jury results, and loads of contentious threads regularly get jury results for various posts in every forum. Calm down.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I don't see the disruption in posting the jury decision. I actually think it would be helpful if more people saw the reasoning (if there is any)behind hiding or not hiding a post.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.