Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Progressive dog

(7,567 posts)
24. Lincoln did not order the executions
Fri Dec 26, 2025, 10:20 PM
6 hrs ago

but he did not order that all those sentenced to death be commuted.
Wikimedia Foundation until you notify us to stop. We’ll send you an email which will include a link to easy cancellation instructions.
Sorry to interrupt, but fewer people are seeing our message this December, and time's running out. Please, donate $2.75.
Contents

(Top)
Background
Trials
Execution
Medical aftermath
References

1862 Mankato mass execution

Article
Talk

Read
Edit
View history

Tools

Appearance
Text

Small
Standard
Large

Width

Standard
Wide

Color (beta)

Automatic
Light
Dark

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1862 Mankato mass execution
Part of aftermath of the 1862 Dakota War

Drawing of the 1862 mass hanging in Mankato, Minnesota
Date December 26, 1862
Location
Mankato, Minnesota

vte

Dakota War of 1862

Lower Sioux Agency Redwood Ferry New Ulm Slaughter Slough Fort Ridgely Fort Abercrombie Birch Coulee Acton Forest City Hutchinson Wood Lake Camp Release Mankato Hangings

Following the Dakota War of 1862, the U.S. government executed 38 Dakota men in Mankato, Minnesota, on December 26, 1862, in the largest mass execution in American history.[1]: 107  In the course of the conflict, 358 American settlers, 77 soldiers, and 36 militia had been killed.[2] A military commission assembled in the aftermath carried out rushed trials of the Dakota men, some lasting only minutes, and ultimately sentencing 307 to death. All but four death sentences were confirmed by Colonel Henry Hastings Sibley.[3] President Abraham Lincoln then reviewed the cases, commuting 264 sentences but approving 39 executions, one later reprieved, amid pressure from Minnesota officials for harsher punishment.[4] The executions, conducted on a specially built gallows before 4,000 spectators, were guarded by 2,000 troops due to local hostility.[5]

A 1912 monument to the hangings was removed in 1971 amid protests, and today, the Mankato Pow-wow and memorial rides honor the executed, reflecting ongoing efforts to address this traumatic history.[1]: 251 
Background

During the 1862 Dakota War, Dakota men attacked over 500 white settlers and took hundreds of "mixed-blood" and white hostages, almost all women and children, causing thousands more to flee southern Minnesota.[1]: 107 [6][7] By the end of the war, 358 settlers had been killed, in addition to 77 soldiers and 36 volunteer militia and armed civilians killed in battle.[8][9] The total number of Dakota casualties is unknown, but 150 Dakota men died in battle. Approximately 2,000 Dakota surrendered or were taken into custody at Fort Snelling, including at least 1,658 non-combatants, as well as those who had opposed the war and helped to free the hostages.[7][1]: 233 
Trials

On September 27, 1862, Colonel Henry Hastings Sibley ordered the creation of a military commission to conduct trials of the Dakota after the Dakota War of 1862. One year later, the judge advocate general determined that Sibley did not have the authority to convene trials of the Dakota due to his level of prejudice and that his actions had violated Article 65 of the United States Articles of War. However, by then the executions had already occurred, and the American Civil War continued to distract the U.S. government.[3][1]: 214–215 

The trials themselves were deficient in many ways, even by military standards, and the officers who oversaw them did not conduct them according to military law.[citation needed] The 400-odd trials commenced on September 28, 1862, and were completed on November 3; some lasted less than 5 minutes. No one explained the proceedings to the defendants, nor were the Dakota represented by defense attorneys.[citation needed]

The trials were also conducted in an atmosphere of extreme racist hostility towards the defendants expressed by the citizenry, the elected officials of the state of Minnesota, and the men conducting the trials themselves. By November 3, the military commission had held trials of 392 Dakota men, with as many as 42 tried in a single day.[3] By November 7 the verdicts were in; the military commission announced that 307 Dakota prisoners had been convicted of the crimes of murder and rape and were sentenced to death. Sibley confirmed all but four of the death sentences.[10]: 71 

President Lincoln was informed by Maj. Gen. John Pope of the sentences on November 10, 1862, in a telegraphic dispatch from Minnesota.[3] His response to Pope was: "Please forward, as soon as possible, the full and complete record of these convictions. And if the record does not indicate the more guilty and influential, of the culprits, please have a careful statement made on these points and forwarded to me. Please send all by mail."[11]

When the death sentences were made public, Henry Benjamin Whipple, the Episcopal bishop of Minnesota and a reformer of U.S. Indian policy, responded by publishing an open letter. He also went to Washington, D.C. in the fall of 1862 to urge Lincoln to proceed with leniency.[12] On the other hand, General Pope and Minnesota Senator Morton S. Wilkinson warned Lincoln that the white population opposed leniency. Governor Alexander Ramsey warned Lincoln that, unless all 303 Dakota were executed, "[P]rivate revenge would on all this border take the place of official judgment on these Indians."[13]

Lincoln completed his review of the transcripts of the 303 trials with the help of two White House lawyers in under a month.[1]: 251  On December 11, 1862, he addressed the Senate regarding his final decision (as he had been requested to do by a resolution passed by that body on December 5, 1862):

Anxious to not act with so much clemency as to encourage another outbreak on the one hand, nor with so much severity as to be real cruelty on the other, I caused a careful examination of the records of trials to be made, in view of first ordering the execution of such as had been proved guilty of violating females. Contrary to my expectations, only two of this class were found. I then directed a further examination, and a classification of all who were proven to have participated in massacres, as distinguished from participation in battles. This class numbered forty, and included the two convicted of female violation. One of the number is strongly recommended by the Commission which tried them for commutation to ten years' imprisonment. I have ordered the other thirty-nine to be executed on Friday, the 19th instant."[14]

In the end, Lincoln commuted the death sentences of 264 prisoners and allowed the execution of 39 men. On December 23, however, Lincoln suspended the execution of one of the 39 condemned men, Tatemima (Round Wind), after Sibley telegraphed him that new information led him to doubt the prisoner's guilt.[3] Thus, the number of condemned men was reduced to the final 38.[citation needed]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1862_Mankato_mass_execution

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Never forget malaise 19 hrs ago #1
Omg that poem! LearnedHand 19 hrs ago #2
The Dakota 38 Clouds Passing 18 hrs ago #3
Slaves still had value. They were still workers. The people never saw the Native Americans as any thing but LiberalArkie 18 hrs ago #4
not sure why you would "ironically" use the tone of a racist bigot to say a bunch of slurs but here we are WhiskeyGrinder 18 hrs ago #6
He edited the remarks wolfie001 17 hrs ago #8
What's "Red***ns?" Polybius 16 hrs ago #12
*** equals "ski" rubbersole 16 hrs ago #14
Ahh Polybius 16 hrs ago #15
Egads no idea wolfie001 15 hrs ago #22
then why not spell it all the way out WhiskeyGrinder 16 hrs ago #18
Because they describe what they heard instead being sugar coated. I remember when the LBGT's were being slured as"QUEER" LiberalArkie 16 hrs ago #19
The OP describes what happened, without sugar coating. And then you added a bunch of slurs -- slurs that are, one could WhiskeyGrinder 16 hrs ago #21
trail of tear? AllaN01Bear 18 hrs ago #5
Lincoln was president. So he was no saint wolfie001 17 hrs ago #7
Thank you for this grim reminder. niyad 17 hrs ago #9
American history.. mountain grammy 17 hrs ago #10
Never forget that Lincoln was far from perfect Polybius 16 hrs ago #11
I have heard white people express bafflement and offense that Native peoples want the Four False Faces removed... TygrBright 16 hrs ago #13
Never heard this in any "history" class or otherwise. We have always been a very racist country. And now getting worse Evolve Dammit 16 hrs ago #16
Made a donation to NARF after reading this. SergeStorms 16 hrs ago #17
... Solly Mack 16 hrs ago #20
afternoon kick WhiskeyGrinder 14 hrs ago #23
Lincoln did not order the executions Progressive dog 6 hrs ago #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»163 years ago today, the ...»Reply #24