Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Snowflake Thiel plans to leave California over a f*cking ONE PERCENT "billionaires tax." ONE F*CKING PERCENT. [View all]still-prayin4rain
(525 posts)79. It was needed at the time because a later overturned SC case was the law of the land.
Now we have the Sixteenth amendment AND the court case that necessitated the amendment has now also been overruled.
On edit: Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Snowflake Thiel plans to leave California over a f*cking ONE PERCENT "billionaires tax." ONE F*CKING PERCENT. [View all]
Miles Archer
18 hrs ago
OP
Those poor Brits. The ultra right has done a great job of ginning raw hate up against immigrants, and
PatrickforB
9 hrs ago
#71
The ultra-rich can easily borrow against their assets to avoid triggering capital gains
unblock
17 hrs ago
#14
Bye bye Fuck face. You should move to Russia, Putin will help you save your pennies.
Autumn
17 hrs ago
#19
I wonder if a retroactive penalty tax would be legal should they leave for that reason.
cstanleytech
16 hrs ago
#24
Obviously his only principle in life is profit above all, no matter how small. What a small human being.
Martin68
16 hrs ago
#25
In addition to 16th amendment arguments, there's also a good argument that the apportionment rule applies
still-prayin4rain
8 hrs ago
#75
It was needed at the time because a later overturned SC case was the law of the land.
still-prayin4rain
7 hrs ago
#79
An immigrant from Germany who doesn't want to chip in for the good of Americans
Mblaze
15 hrs ago
#41
He would say it is the principle because he and most of his other oligarch companions' only
Bev54
15 hrs ago
#46
Wish they would all move to their compounds in Honduras and Costa Rica to live out their little randian fantasies.
pecosbob
14 hrs ago
#48
I'm appalled that my state wants a 1% increase in taxes for those with wealth over 1 billion dollars.
Buddyzbuddy
12 hrs ago
#61
They want their personal money in some place like Texas, but their investments still here.
paulkienitz
5 hrs ago
#80