General Discussion

TomSlick

(12,871 posts)

7. I'm skeptical. I would expect any contracts with the Kennedy Center to survive the name change.

Sun Dec 28, 2025, 06:36 PM

4 hrs ago

The argument that the name change was illegal is illogical. If the name change was illegal, then the contract with the Kennedy Center was unaffected by the name change.

Proof of damages will be problematic. The misnamed arts center would have to prove what net income was lost by the cancellation. If ticket sales have dropped since the name change, it may be that the the misnamed arts center was actually saved from a net loss.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump's Kennedy Center ally hits musician with $1M demand over Christmas Eve cancelation [View all] LetMyPeopleVote 9 hrs ago OP

Blind hypocrisy sunflowerseed 8 hrs ago #1

This right here: odins folly 8 hrs ago #2

Ridiculous C_U_L8R 7 hrs ago #3

They could "perform" and just play diss tracks newdeal2 7 hrs ago #4

This will *really* get more artists to want to perform at the already scorned and blacklisted Trump Kennedy Center. LetMyPeopleVote 7 hrs ago #5

Question for the Legal eagles - can't an argument for dismissal be UTUSN 6 hrs ago #6

I'm skeptical. I would expect any contracts with the Kennedy Center to survive the name change. TomSlick 4 hrs ago #7

All these assholes do is sue people. Initech 3 hrs ago #9

Fortunately, the MAGA lawyers are usually incompetent. TomSlick 3 hrs ago #10

That is true! Initech 3 hrs ago #11

Oh go get royally fucked, assholes! Initech 3 hrs ago #8